The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Not to Count the Poor
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988
Summers, R., & Heston, A. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937941 · Cited by 3,429
Cited by
The Capability Approach in Practice*
Robeyns, I. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x · Cited by 836
Is Globalization Reducing Poverty and Inequality?
Wade, R. H. (2004) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.10.007 · Cited by 649
New theoretical perspectives on the distribution of income and wealth among individuals,
Stiglitz, J. E. (2016) · Inequality and Growth: Patterns and Policy · doi:10.1057/9781137554543_1 · Cited by 122
Towards Genuine Universalism within Contemporary Development Policy
Fischer, A. M. (2010) · IDS Bulletin · doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00101.x · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, S. G., & Pogge, T. W.
- Published
- 2009-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W1498920961
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 92.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Not to Count the Poor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7916/d8p274zs
- The paper
- Reddy, S. G., & Pogge, T. W. (2009). How Not to Count the Poor. https://doi.org/10.7916/d8p274zs
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
