Cited by 1Intellectual Property Rights and MediaCopyright and Intellectual PropertyDigital Platforms and Economics

The DOI matches its DataCite record, with a small difference in title or year.

The Commodification of Information Commons

Open access
Filippi, Primavera De, Vieira, Miguel Said·2014·Science and Technology Law Review

Abstract

Internet and digital technologies allowed for the emergence of new modes of production involving cooperation and collaboration amongst peers (peer-production). In contrast with traditional models of production oriented towards the maximization of profits, these alternative modes of production are, more often than not, oriented towards the maximization of the common good. To ensure that content will always remain available to the public, the output of production is often released under a specific regime that prevents anyone from subsequently turning it into a commodity (the regime of information commons). While this might reduce the likelihood of commodification, information commons can nonetheless be exploited by the market economy. Indeed, since they have been made available for use by anyone, large online service providers can indirectly benefit from the commons by capturing the value derived from it. While this is not a problem per se, problems arise when the exploitation of the commons by one agent is likely to preclude others from doing the same—often as a result of commodification. This is especially true in the context of cloud computing, where the content holder has become as powerful as, if not more powerful than the copyright owner. Nowadays, regardless of their legal status, information commons are increasingly controlled by large corporations who can precisely define the manner in which they can be used or accessed. Digital communities need to be aware of these ri…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.7916/stlr.v16i1.3991

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Filippi, P. D., & Vieira, M. S.
Venue
Science and Technology Law Review
Publisher
Science and Technology Law Review
Published
2014-12-21
OpenAlex
W6977892417
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Copyright and Intellectual Property
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
information commons, commodification, peer production, commons-based peer production, cloud computing, copyright, online service providers, decentralized platforms, peer-to-peer architecture, online communities, commons governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review