The DOI matches its DataCite record.
The Limits of Online Price Discrimination in Europe
Open accessAbstract
As big data capabilities have increased, so too has the potential for price discrimination. Price discrimination occurs when sellers offer goods and services at different prices to different consumers. Profiles of consumers can be created based on a variety of factors, such as their location, past purchases or behaviors online, or, more frequently, a large number offactors that, when combined, enables sellers to serve tailored prices based on differences between consumer profiles. In addition to these algorithmic forms of price discrimination, simpler methods are also in use, such as basing prices solely on the basis of a consumer’s IP address. This article aims to provide a comprehensive mapping of the boundaries of online price discrimination in Europe. While few legal provisions speak directly to online price discrimination or personalized pricing, a number of areas of law likely have a bearing on the extent to which price discrimination is legally permitted. As such, this article will examine competition law, consumer protection law, data protection law, and non-discrimination law in order to determine where online price discrimination may constitute noncompliance with one of the relevant provisions, as well as to denote where it appears that the framework is ill-equipped to adequately address the practice. Practical and sociological aspects relating to both online price discrimination and the application of the legal frameworks in these areas are also incorporated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Limiting our analysis to Europe, few legal provisions speak directly to online personalized pricing.”
From A note on the future of personalized pricing: cause for concern (2020) · cites this paper as Sears 2020
In the citing paper
“However, four specific areas of law may influence the extent to which this discriminatory pricing practice is limited, although it is doubtful whether this will happen, at least in the short run (Sears 2020).”
From A note on the future of personalized pricing: cause for concern (2020) · cites this paper as Sears 2020
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A note on the future of personalized pricing: cause for concern
van der Rest, J.-P. I., Sears, A. M., Miao, L., & Wang, L. (2020) · Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management · doi:10.1057/s41272-020-00234-6 · Cited by 34
Self-citationvan der Rest, J.-P. I., Sears, A. M., Kuokkanen, H., & Heidary, K. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights · doi:10.1108/jhti-08-2021-0216 · Cited by 25
Self-citationAffinity-based algorithmic pricing: A dilemma for EU data protection law
Li, Z. (2022) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105705 · Cited by 17
A qualitative investigation of company perspectives on online price discrimination
Heidary, K., Custers, B. H. M., Pluut, H., & van der Rest, J.-P. I. (2022) · Computer law & security review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105734 · Cited by 14
Do Online Firms Individualize Search Results? An Empirical Analysis of Individualization on Amazon
Ahmed, R., Seesi, S. A., & Sánchez, G. R. (2022) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer17030061 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Sears, A. M.
- Corresponding author
- Sears, Alan M.
- ORCID
- Sears, Alan M.
- Venue
- Science and Technology Law Review
- Publisher
- Science and Technology Law Review
- Published
- 2020-03-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-42
- ISSN
- 1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035581595
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
- Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › European and International Contract Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Keywords
- personalized pricing, algorithmic pricing, competition law, consumer protection law, data protection law, anti-discrimination law, consumer profiling, big data, European Union law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Limits of Online Price Discrimination in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7916/stlr.v21i1.5761
- The paper
- Sears, A. M. (2020). The Limits of Online Price Discrimination in Europe. Science and Technology Law Review. https://doi.org/10.7916/stlr.v21i1.5761