Cited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Glacial features of the Milan, Berlin, and Shelburne map areas of northern New Hampshire

Gerath, Robert F.·1978·McGill University

Abstract

This item was digitized as part of a project to share McGill's intellectual legacy with the public. If you are the copyright holder or a relative of the copyright holder who is deceased, you may request withdrawal by emailing escholarship.library@mcgill.ca. The full policy for eScholarship may be accessed here: https://www.mcgill.ca/libraries/research-services/escholarship/policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.82308/8053

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent descriptions of moraines and glaciotectonic structures in the northeastern White Mountains have shown that active ice persisted during deglaciation in areas that were topographically favorable for sustained glacial flow.

    “Recent descriptions of moraines and glaciotectonic structures in the northeastern White Mountains have shown that active ice persisted during deglaciation in areas that were topographically favorable for sustained glacial flow (e.g.Gerath, 1978; Gerath et al., 1985; and Thompson and Fowler, 1989).”

    From Deglaciation of the northwestern White Mountains, New Hampshire (2002) · cites this paper as Gerath, 1978

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gerath, R. F.
Venue
McGill University
Publisher
McGill University
Published
1978
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review