CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Psychiatric care and mental health servicesEvaluation and Performance AssessmentChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Impact and process evaluation of Forward Thinking Birmingham, the 0-25 Mental Health Service : Final Report

Open access
Birchwood, M. J., Street, Catherine, Singh, Swaran P., Lamb, Clare, Anderson, Yvonne, Warner-Gale, Fiona, Sedgewick, Jane, Thompson, Andrew David, Upthegrove, Rachel·2018·University of Warwick
DOI 10.82444/warw.33754813
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This report provides the findings of a year-long evaluation of Forward Thinking Birmingham (FTB) which started just after the service went live in October 2015. Undertaken by a team from the University of Warwick and the GIFT Partnership, the purpose of the evaluation was to understand how the changes to mental health service provision for children and young people aged 0-25 and their parents and carers outlined in the new FTB model impact on key stakeholders across a range of service settings and types. The aim was to generate learning about the new model as to whether it worked/was achieving its specified objectives, what was perhaps less successful and needed amendment or further development. The evaluation would also provide an opportunity to think about the future development of the service in order to ensure a robust and sustainable model of provision.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.82444/warw.33754813

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other jurisdictions have implemented variations of similar integrated youth mental health care models, adapted to local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors.

    “Other jurisdictions-notably, Ireland, 289 Canada, 290-292 the UK, 293,294 Denmark, Singapore, 295 the USA, the Netherlands, 296 Japan, 297 South Korea, 298 Israel, 299 Hong Kong, 300 Iceland, France, 301 and New Zealand 302 -have implemented variations of similar models, which have been adapted to meet local need as well as cultural, workforce, and financial factors (panel”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [293]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381-398.
  2. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). 2 how actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107.
  3. Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937-962.
  4. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
  5. Llewellyn, S. (2001). Two-way windows': clinicians as medical managers. Organization Studies, 22(4), 593-623.
  6. McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1389-1412.
  7. Radaelli, G., Currie, G., Frattini, F., & Lettieri, E. (2017). The Role of Managers in Enacting Two-Step Institutional Work for Radical Innovation in Professional Organizations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, early view
  8. Scott, W. R. (2003). Institutional carriers: reviewing modes of transporting ideas over time and space and considering their consequences. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 879- 894.
  9. Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26(5), 683-706.
  10. Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Harrington, H., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2003). Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder: developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 60(7):709-17.
  11. McGorry, P., Bates, T., & Birchwood, M. (2013). Designing youth mental health services for the 21st century: examples from Australia, Ireland and the UK. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202: s30-s35. Joint Commissioning Panel for Mental Health. (2011). 10 key messages for commissioners - Child and adolescent mental health services.
  12. Kessler, R. C., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Merikangas, K. R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 62(6):617-27.
  13. Kessler, R. C., et al. (2007) on behalf of The WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization's World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry, 6(3): 168-176.
  14. Bhui, K., Stansfeld, S., Hull, S., Priebe, S., Mole, F., & Feder, G. (2003). Ethnic variations in pathways to and use of specialist mental health services in the UK: Systematic review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182:105-116.
  15. Harty, M. A., Leese, M. D. M., Thornicroft, G., Shaw, J., Thomas, S., & Mohan, R. (2006). Ethnic differences among patients in high-security psychiatric hospitals in England. British Journal of Psychiatry, 188:380-385.
  16. Cochrane, R. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1996). Mental Health and Ethnic Minorities: a Review of the Literature and Implications for Services. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination/Social Policy Research Unit. Report 5.York:University of York.
  17. Brohan, E., Slade, M., Clement, S., & Thornicroft, G. (2010). Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures. BMC Health Services Research, 10(80). References for outcomes scales (link to Chapter 4)
  18. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, et al. The warwick-edinburgh mental well-being scale (wemwbs): Development and uk validation. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2007;5:63.
  19. Gowers SG, Harrington RC, Whitton A, et al. Health of the nation outcome scales for children and adolescents (honosca). Glossary for honosca score sheet. Br J Psychiatry. 1999;174:428-431.
  20. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The phq-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606-613.
  21. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines. 1997;38:581-586.
  22. Ising HK, Veling W, Loewy RL, et al. The validity of the 16-item version of the prodromal questionnaire (pq-16) to screen for ultra high risk of developing psychosis in the general help-seeking population. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2012;38:1288-1296.
  23. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The gad-7. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166:1092-1097.
  24. Singh SP, Cooper JE, Fisher HL, et al. Determining the chronology and components of psychosis onset: The nottingham onset schedule (nos). Schizophrenia Research. 2005;80:117-130.
  25. Shaffer D, Gould MS, Brasic J, et al. A children's global assessment scale (cgas). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40:1228-1231.
  26. Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33:766- 771.
  27. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32:959-976.
  28. Euroqol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The euroqol group. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 1990;16:199-208.
  29. Cornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, et al. Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:688-702.
  30. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International journal of behavioral medicine. 2008;15:194-200.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Birchwood, M. J., Street, C., Singh, S. P., Lamb, C., Anderson, Y., Warner-Gale, F., Sedgewick, J., Thompson, A. D., & Upthegrove, R.
ORCID
Venue
University of Warwick
Publisher
University of Warwick
Published
2018-03-28
DOI
10.82444/warw.33754813
OpenAlex
W2822764792
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Warwick (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Warwick
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child and adolescent mental health services, mental health service reform, service evaluation, stakeholder perspectives, parents and caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review