Effect of Probiotics (Bacillus subtilis) on the Growth and Survival of Fingerlings of Grass Carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella
Open accessAbstract
In the modern high intensity aquaculture, probiotics offer an encouraging substitute to chemicals and antibiotics, one such important application of probiotics is their use as growth promoters, in addition to health and water quality management. On the same background, the study was carried to evaluate the effect of dietary incorporation of probiotic - Bacillus subtilis on the growth performance of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella).The probiotic - Bacillus subtilis was mixed with the basal diet (Protein 32%) in three different concentrations (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 % designated as T1, T2, and T3). The basal feed with no probiotic was used as control (T0). The impact was recorded for a period of 60 days. Feeding was done twice a day at the rate of 5% of their body weight. Growth performance was evaluated through estimation of weight gain, feed Conversion Ratio (FCR), protein Efficiency Ratio (PER), specific growth rate (SGR) and feed efficiency ratio (FER). It was observed that the probiotic Bacillussubtilis fed at 1.5% significantly improved the growth performance of the fish Ctenopharyngodon idella showing the highest growth rate followed by 1% and 0.5% probiotic fed diets. Lowest growth rate was recorded in control group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bacillus subtilis strains are extensively integrated into aquafeeds, serving either as probiotics or single-cell proteins, due to their proven nutritional advantages for farmed fish.
“Bacillus subtilis strains are extensively integrated into aquafeeds, serving either as probiotics or single-cell proteins, due to their proven nutritional advantages for farmed fish.”
From Optimization of Bacillus subtilis PW12 biomass production using RSM: a preliminary study towards single-cell protein production for aquaculture (2024) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gracious, M., & Nandakumar, S. (2024) · Journal of Applied Biology & Biotechnology · doi:10.7324/jabb.2024.177031 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“[5-7] .”
- Authors
- Shah, S., Chesti, A., Rather, M., Hafeez, M., Aijaz, A., Yousuf, I., & Jan, S.
- Affiliations
- Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (IN)
- Venue
- Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Sciencedomain International
- Published
- 2021-07-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 31-37
- ISSN
- 2457-1024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3185658644
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- probiotics, Bacillus subtilis, grass carp, fingerlings, growth performance, feed conversion ratio, protein efficiency ratio, specific growth rate, aquaculture feed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review