Cited by 3Odor and Emission Control TechnologiesChild Nutrition and Water AccessWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Wind Speed Thresholds for Adjusting Conventional Design Criteria for the Ventilated Improved Pit Latrine without Compromising Odour Control

Open access
Obeng, Peter Appiah, Awere, Eric, Obeng, Panin Asirifua, Oteng-Peprah, Michael, Barnie, Samuel·2022·Journal of Engineering Research and Reports

Abstract

Aims: The objective of this paper is to re-evaluate the wind speed threshold at which the 100 mm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) vent pipe may be used without compromising the ventilation rate required for effective odor control in a ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrine. The paper also sought to investigate the chances of leveraging upon high wind speeds to grant user preferences for multiple windows and installation of insect screens, which are conventionally forbidden. Study Design: A comparative experimental design was carried out in a VIP latrine with internal cubicle dimensions of 1.2 m x 1.5 m built over a pit of cross-section 1.2 m x 2.5 m and depth of 3.0 m which was fitted with a 100 mm PVC vent pipe. Place and Duration of Study: The experimental setup was located on the compound of a public basic school in Prampram, a peri-urban coastal community in Southern Ghana. The setup was monitored for twelve hours a day (5 am to 5 pm) for twelve days. Methodology: The experimental setups comprised of four designs of the VIP latrine: single-window and multi-window designs each with and without insect screen in the window. The ventilation rate in each modified design was monitored simultaneously with the external wind speed. Results: The results of the study indicate that the 100 mm PVC vent pipe could attain the recommended ventilation rate of 20 m3/h at an average wind speed as slow as 1.5 m/s as compared to the 3 m/s previously suggested. The influence of wind speed on the ventilation rate is insignificant at wind speed variations not exceeding 0.5 m/s when the 100 mm PVC vent pipe is used. Conclusion: At an average wind speed of 1.5 m/s, either the multiple-window design or insect screen used in combination with the 100 mm PVC vent pipe could attain the recommended ventilation rate and should not be outrightly forbidden. However, a wind speed threshold of 2.5 m/s is required for the adoption of the multi-window design with insect screens when the 100 mm PVC vent pipe is used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9734/jerr/2022/v23i12790

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obeng, P. A., Awere, E., Obeng, P. A., Oteng-Peprah, M., & Barnie, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Coast (GH)
  • Cape Coast Technical University (GH)
Venue
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
Published
2022-12-26
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
353-362
ISSN
2582-2926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313469494
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Engineering Research and Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of Engineering Research and Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
ventilated improved pit latrines, wind speed threshold, ventilation rate, odor control, insect screens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review