Wind Speed Thresholds for Adjusting Conventional Design Criteria for the Ventilated Improved Pit Latrine without Compromising Odour Control
Open accessAbstract
Aims: The objective of this paper is to re-evaluate the wind speed threshold at which the 100 mm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) vent pipe may be used without compromising the ventilation rate required for effective odor control in a ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrine. The paper also sought to investigate the chances of leveraging upon high wind speeds to grant user preferences for multiple windows and installation of insect screens, which are conventionally forbidden. Study Design: A comparative experimental design was carried out in a VIP latrine with internal cubicle dimensions of 1.2 m x 1.5 m built over a pit of cross-section 1.2 m x 2.5 m and depth of 3.0 m which was fitted with a 100 mm PVC vent pipe. Place and Duration of Study: The experimental setup was located on the compound of a public basic school in Prampram, a peri-urban coastal community in Southern Ghana. The setup was monitored for twelve hours a day (5 am to 5 pm) for twelve days. Methodology: The experimental setups comprised of four designs of the VIP latrine: single-window and multi-window designs each with and without insect screen in the window. The ventilation rate in each modified design was monitored simultaneously with the external wind speed. Results: The results of the study indicate that the 100 mm PVC vent pipe could attain the recommended ventilation rate of 20 m3/h at an average wind speed as slow as 1.5 m/s as compared to the 3 m/s previously suggested. The influence of wind speed on the ventilation rate is insignificant at wind speed variations not exceeding 0.5 m/s when the 100 mm PVC vent pipe is used. Conclusion: At an average wind speed of 1.5 m/s, either the multiple-window design or insect screen used in combination with the 100 mm PVC vent pipe could attain the recommended ventilation rate and should not be outrightly forbidden. However, a wind speed threshold of 2.5 m/s is required for the adoption of the multi-window design with insect screens when the 100 mm PVC vent pipe is used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 100 mm diameter PVC pipe is proven to be capable of yielding the recommended ventilation rate in areas where the wind speed reaches an average of 1.5 m/s.
“With the 100 mm diameter PVC pipe proven to be capable of yielding the recommended ventilation rate in areas where the wind speed reaches an average of 1.5 m/s [38]”
From Compliance of private ventilated improved pit latrines to odour and fly control guidelines: A technical audit in selected regions of Ghana (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Department of Environmental Health, F. O. H. S., Aiyuk, S., & Tsepa, M. (2017) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Development · doi:10.18178/ijesd.2017.8.8.1022 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Obeng, P. A., Donkor, E. A., Awere, E., Oduro-Kwarteng, S., Obeng, P. A., & Awuah, E. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33980 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Further research is required to generate additional data to assess the potential of the 100 mm diameter vent pipe at lower wind speeds as suggested by Obeng et al. [38].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Obeng, P. A., Awere, E., Obeng, P. A., Oteng-Peprah, M., & Barnie, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Cape Coast (GH)
- Cape Coast Technical University (GH)
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering Research and Reports
- Publisher
- Sciencedomain International
- Published
- 2022-12-26
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 353-362
- ISSN
- 2582-2926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4313469494
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering Research and Reports (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Engineering Research and Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Odor and Emission Control Technologies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Keywords
- ventilated improved pit latrines, wind speed threshold, ventilation rate, odor control, insect screens
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review