The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Experiences of Distance Education Students with Online Information Literacy Instruction at the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana
Open accessAbstract
Information literacy is the ability to find, evaluate, and ethically use reliable information to solve problems and create knowledge in academic and professional settings. This study explored the lived experiences of distance education students with online information literacy instruction at the University of Health and Allied Sciences (UHAS), Ghana, and examined the perceived challenges and learning benefits associated with this mode of instruction. A qualitative research approach was adopted, involving semi-structured interviews with 20 sandwich nursing students selected through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with NVivo software. The findings revealed that students generally perceived online information literacy instruction as structured, relevant, and beneficial for their academic and professional development. Four themes emerged regarding students’ experiences: exposure to structured but unevenly accessible instruction, reliance on blended learning and recorded materials, development of digital academic competencies, and the influence of clinical and community work environments. Challenges identified included poor internet connectivity, high data costs, limited access to digital devices, and competing professional responsibilities, which often disrupted participation in synchronous sessions. Despite these barriers, participants reported significant improvements in database searching, critical evaluation of information sources, evidence-based practice, academic writing, and confidence in using digital resources. The study concludes that online information literacy instruction plays a vital role in supporting distance learners’ academic success and professional growth. It recommends strengthening asynchronous learning opportunities, enhancing digital infrastructure, and providing continuous technical support to improve equitable access and learning outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Osman, H., & Kugblenu-Mahama, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Health and Allied Sciences (GH)
- Ho Technical University (GH)
- Venue
- Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science
- Publisher
- Sciencedomain International
- Published
- 2026-06-15
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 20-35
- ISSN
- 2278-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2456-981X
- OpenAlex
- W7164853060
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science (publishedVersion)
- Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- information literacy instruction, distance education, online learning, nursing students, student lived experiences, internet access barriers, digital technology access, evidence-based practice, database searching, critical evaluation of information sources, asynchronous learning, blended learning, digital skills
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiences of Distance Education Students with Online Information Literacy Instruction at the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.9734/jesbs/2026/v39i41495
- The paper
- Osman, H., & Kugblenu-Mahama, H. A. (2026). Experiences of Distance Education Students with Online Information Literacy Instruction at the University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ghana. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2026/v39i41495