Cited by 8Machine Learning and Data ClassificationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOnline Learning and Analytics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient and Robust Model Benchmarks with Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing

Open access
Song, Hao, Flach, Peter·2021·International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Progress in predictive machine learning is typically measured on the basis of performance comparisons on benchmark datasets. Traditionally these kinds of empirical evaluation are carried out on large numbers of datasets, but this is becoming increasingly hard due to computational requirements and the often large number of alternative methods to compare against. In this paper we investigate adaptive approaches to achieve better efficiency on model benchmarking. For a large collection of datasets, rather than training and testing a given approach on every individual dataset, we seek methods that allow us to pick only a few representative datasets to quantify the model’s goodness, from which to extrapolate to performance on other datasets. To this end, we adapt existing approaches from psychometrics: specifically, Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing. Both are well-founded frameworks designed for educational tests. We propose certain modifications following the requirements of machine learning experiments, and present experimental results to validate the approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9781/ijimai.2021.02.009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. M. Hutson, "Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis, " 2018. [Online]. Available: https://science.sci-encemag.org/ content/359/6377/725, doi: 10.1126/sci-ence.359.6377.725. · DOI
  2. J. Vanschoren, J. N. Van Rijn, B. Bischl, L. Torgo, "OpenML: networked science in machine learning, " ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 49-60, 2014.
  3. G. A. Morris, L. Branum-Martin, N. Harshman, S. D. Baker, E. Mazur, S. Dutta, T. Mzoughi, V. McCauley, "Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality, " American Journal of Physics, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 449-453, 2006.
  4. W. J. van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton, Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  5. B. F. Green, R. D. Bock, L. G. Humphreys, R. L. Linn, M. D. Reckase, "Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests, " Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 347-360, 1984.
  6. D. J. Weiss, G. G. Kingsbury, "Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems, " Journal of Educa-tional Measurement, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 361-375, 1984.
  7. Y. Chen, T. S. Filho, R. B. Prudencio, T. Diethe, P. Flach, "β3-IRT: A new item response model and its applications, " in AISTATS 2019, vol. 89 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2019, pp. 1013-1021.
  8. B. P. Veldkamp, M. Matteucci, "Bayesian computerized adaptive testing, " Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, vol. 21, no. 78, pp. 57-82, 2013.
  9. R. R. Meijer, M. L. Nering, "Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction, " 1999. [Online]. Available: https://doi. org/10.1177/01466219922031310, doi: 10.1177/01466219922031310. · DOI
  10. H.-H. Chang, "Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing, " Psychometrika, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2015.
  11. H.-H. Chang, Z. Ying, "A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing, " Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 213-229, 1996.
  12. R. B. Prudêncio, J. Hernández-Orallo, A. Martínez-Usó, "Analysis of instance hardness in machine learning using item response theory, " in Second International Workshop on Learning over Multiple Contexts in ECML 2015. Porto, Portugal, 11 September 2015, 2015.
  13. F. Martínez-Plumed, R. B. Prudêncio, A. Martínez-Usó, J. Hernández- Orallo, "Making sense of item response theory in machine learning, " in Proceedings of the Twentysecond European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016, pp. 1140-1148, IOS Press.
  14. K. SHOJIMA, "A noniterative item parameter solution in each em cycle of the continuous response model, " Educational technology research, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 11-22, 2005.
  15. F. Samejima, "Graded response model, " in Handbook of modern item response theory, Springer, 1997, pp. 85-100.
  16. R. S. Olson, W. La Cava, P. Orzechowski, R. J. Urbanowicz, J. H. Moore, "Pmlb: a large benchmark suite for ma-chine learning evaluation and comparison, " BioData mining, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 36, 2017.
  17. M. Feurer, A. Klein, K. Eggensperger, J. Springenberg, M. Blum, F. Hutter, "Efficient and robust automated machine learning, " in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, pp. 2962-2970.
  18. J. Sympson, R. Hetter, "Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing, " pp. 973-977, 1985.
  19. Hao Song HS obtained his PhD at the University of Bristol in 2017, and is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Bristol. His research interests include quantifying different types of uncertainties within the machine learning pipeline, particularly for different probabilistic out-puts and corresponding evaluation metrics. Peter Flach PF is Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of Bristol and has over 30 years experience in machine learning and data mining, with particular expertise in mining highly-structured data and the evaluation and improvement of machine learning models. He was PC co- chair of KDD'09 and ECML-PKDD'12 and has edited and authored several books, including Machine Learning: the Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Song, H., & Flach, P.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Flach, Peter
Venue
International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
110-118
ISSN
1989-1660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135445364
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
Keywords
model benchmarking, item response theory, adaptive testing, psychometrics, machine learning model evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review