The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficient and Robust Model Benchmarks with Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing
Open accessAbstract
Progress in predictive machine learning is typically measured on the basis of performance comparisons on benchmark datasets. Traditionally these kinds of empirical evaluation are carried out on large numbers of datasets, but this is becoming increasingly hard due to computational requirements and the often large number of alternative methods to compare against. In this paper we investigate adaptive approaches to achieve better efficiency on model benchmarking. For a large collection of datasets, rather than training and testing a given approach on every individual dataset, we seek methods that allow us to pick only a few representative datasets to quantify the model’s goodness, from which to extrapolate to performance on other datasets. To this end, we adapt existing approaches from psychometrics: specifically, Item Response Theory and Adaptive Testing. Both are well-founded frameworks designed for educational tests. We propose certain modifications following the requirements of machine learning experiments, and present experimental results to validate the approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- M. Hutson, "Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis, " 2018. [Online]. Available: https://science.sci-encemag.org/ content/359/6377/725, doi: 10.1126/sci-ence.359.6377.725. · DOI
- J. Vanschoren, J. N. Van Rijn, B. Bischl, L. Torgo, "OpenML: networked science in machine learning, " ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 49-60, 2014.
- G. A. Morris, L. Branum-Martin, N. Harshman, S. D. Baker, E. Mazur, S. Dutta, T. Mzoughi, V. McCauley, "Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality, " American Journal of Physics, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 449-453, 2006.
- W. J. van der Linden, R. K. Hambleton, Handbook of modern item response theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
- B. F. Green, R. D. Bock, L. G. Humphreys, R. L. Linn, M. D. Reckase, "Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests, " Journal of Educational Measurement, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 347-360, 1984.
- D. J. Weiss, G. G. Kingsbury, "Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems, " Journal of Educa-tional Measurement, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 361-375, 1984.
- Y. Chen, T. S. Filho, R. B. Prudencio, T. Diethe, P. Flach, "β3-IRT: A new item response model and its applications, " in AISTATS 2019, vol. 89 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2019, pp. 1013-1021.
- B. P. Veldkamp, M. Matteucci, "Bayesian computerized adaptive testing, " Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, vol. 21, no. 78, pp. 57-82, 2013.
- R. R. Meijer, M. L. Nering, "Computerized adaptive testing: Overview and introduction, " 1999. [Online]. Available: https://doi. org/10.1177/01466219922031310, doi: 10.1177/01466219922031310. · DOI
- H.-H. Chang, "Psychometrics behind computerized adaptive testing, " Psychometrika, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2015.
- H.-H. Chang, Z. Ying, "A global information approach to computerized adaptive testing, " Applied Psychological Measurement, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 213-229, 1996.
- R. B. Prudêncio, J. Hernández-Orallo, A. Martínez-Usó, "Analysis of instance hardness in machine learning using item response theory, " in Second International Workshop on Learning over Multiple Contexts in ECML 2015. Porto, Portugal, 11 September 2015, 2015.
- F. Martínez-Plumed, R. B. Prudêncio, A. Martínez-Usó, J. Hernández- Orallo, "Making sense of item response theory in machine learning, " in Proceedings of the Twentysecond European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016, pp. 1140-1148, IOS Press.
- K. SHOJIMA, "A noniterative item parameter solution in each em cycle of the continuous response model, " Educational technology research, vol. 28, no. 1-2, pp. 11-22, 2005.
- F. Samejima, "Graded response model, " in Handbook of modern item response theory, Springer, 1997, pp. 85-100.
- R. S. Olson, W. La Cava, P. Orzechowski, R. J. Urbanowicz, J. H. Moore, "Pmlb: a large benchmark suite for ma-chine learning evaluation and comparison, " BioData mining, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 36, 2017.
- M. Feurer, A. Klein, K. Eggensperger, J. Springenberg, M. Blum, F. Hutter, "Efficient and robust automated machine learning, " in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2015, pp. 2962-2970.
- J. Sympson, R. Hetter, "Controlling item-exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing, " pp. 973-977, 1985.
- Hao Song HS obtained his PhD at the University of Bristol in 2017, and is currently a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Bristol. His research interests include quantifying different types of uncertainties within the machine learning pipeline, particularly for different probabilistic out-puts and corresponding evaluation metrics. Peter Flach PF is Professor of Artificial Intelligence at the University of Bristol and has over 30 years experience in machine learning and data mining, with particular expertise in mining highly-structured data and the evaluation and improvement of machine learning models. He was PC co- chair of KDD'09 and ECML-PKDD'12 and has edited and authored several books, including Machine Learning: the Art and Science of Algorithms that Make Sense of Data.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
Kwa, T., West, B., Becker, J., Deng, A., Garcia, K., Hasin, M., Jawhar, S., Kinniment, M., Rush, N., Von Arx, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14499 · Cited by 14
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
Kwa, T., West, B., Becker, J., Deng, A., Garcia, K., Hasin, M., Jawhar, S., Kinniment, M., Rush, N., Von Arx, S., et al. (2025) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 38 · doi:10.52202/085713-3086 · Cited by 21
“IRT has been applied to machine learning classifiers by Mart´ınez-Plumed et al. [26], and was used to design efficient benchmarks in Song and Flach [43].”
What Are We Actually Benchmarking in Robot Manipulation?
Jiang, T., Tan, X., Wheeler, S., Sun, L., Ayalew, T. W., & Walter, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.04233
“Combined with adaptive selection of test instances by this difficulty [48, 49], this direction could address creeping overfitting, data-source dependence, and statistical-power constraints jointly rather than one at a time.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, H., & Flach, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Flach, Peter
- Venue
- International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence
- Published
- 2021-03-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 110-118
- ISSN
- 1989-1660 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3135445364
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- model benchmarking, item response theory, adaptive testing, psychometrics, machine learning model evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review