Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Moerman was the first applied linguist to include cultural and historical knowledge in conversation analysis.
“Moerman, who like Schegloff was based at UCLA, was the first applied linguist to include cultural and historical knowledge in the field of conversation analysis, that had been conceived by Schegloff as the pure study of the here-and-now turns at talk in conversation.”
From Language and Culture (2014) · cites this paper as Moerman (1988)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kramsch, C. (2014) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.27.02kra · Cited by 1,539 · see citing works
Making Gender Relevant: Conversation Analysis and Gender Categories in Interaction
STOKOE, E. H., & SMITHSON, J. (2001) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926501012002005 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moerman, M.
- Corresponding author
- Moerman, Michael
- Venue
- University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Pennsylvania Press
- Published
- 1988-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4240610231
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 44.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
- Keywords
- culture, conversation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
