The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chapter 2. Uncomfortable Silences: Contemporary Slavery and the “Lessons” of History
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Modern slavery has taken on new forms, but, as Quirk (2012) argues, it must be understood as an extension and/or reconfiguration of historical slavery rather than something entirely new.”
From Historicizing Modern Slavery: Free-Grown Sugar as an Ethics-Driven Market Category in Nineteenth-Century Britain (2020) · cites this paper as Quirk (2012)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, A., & Johns, J. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04318-1 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Quirk, J.
- Corresponding author
- Quirk, Joel
- ORCID
- Quirk, Joel
- Venue
- From Human Trafficking to Human Rights
- Publisher
- University of Pennsylvania Press
- Published
- 2012-12-31
- Pages
- 25-43
- OpenAlex
- W2496591997
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.06
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- modern slavery, historical memory, lessons of history, silence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
