Cited by 67Health and Conflict StudiesPeacebuilding and International SecurityHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

Searching for Normal in the Wake of the Liberian War

Abramowitz, Sharon Alane·2014·University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks

Abstract

Sharon Alane Abramowitz examine how humanitarian healthcare dealt with mental health and psychiatry during Liberia's turbulent postwar transition, looking closely at the ways mental health and psychosocial interventions worked to manage trauma and produce postwar peace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9783/9780812209938

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abramowitz, S. A.
Corresponding author
Abramowitz, Sharon Alane
Venue
University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks
Published
2014-12-31
OpenAlex
W561015836
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.23
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
humanitarian health care, psychosocial interventions, trauma, psychiatry, normality, Liberia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review