CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 676

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dispossessed Lives: Enslaved Women, Violence, and the Archive

Fuentes, Marisa J.·2016
DOI 10.9783/9780812293005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Vividly recounting the lives of enslaved women in eighteenth-century Bridgetown, Barbados, and their conditions of confinement through urban, legal, sexual, and representational power wielded by slave owners, authorities, and the archive, Marisa J. Fuentes challenges how histories of vulnerable and invisible subjects are written.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9783/9780812293005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since most archival records and archaeological research preserve events from the perspective of white European males and silence the voices of subjugated persons, those who are committed to telling the stories of the oppressed must work to undo this pattern of erasure.

    “Since most archival records and archaeological research preserve events from the perspective of white European males and silence the voices of subjugated persons, those who are committed to telling the stories of the oppressed must work to undo this pattern of erasure (Fuentes 2016).”

    From Creating Community and Engaging Community: The Foundations of the Estate Little Princess Archaeology Project in St. Croix, United States Virgin Islands (2022) · cites this paper as Fuentes 2016

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fuentes, M. J.
Publisher
University of Pennsylvania Press
Published
2016-06-03
DOI
10.9783/9780812293005
Cited by
676
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review