Cited by 1Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyMarriage and Sexual RelationshipsPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Cybersex: Advantages And Disadvantages

Open access
University Putra Malaysia. Malaysia, Tanimoonwo, Grace·2013·IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science

Abstract

Theavailability, anonymity and accessibility of the Internet have made the compulsive behavior of cybersex and cyber affairs more common in America and the world.The Internet has enabled people to fulfill their sexual fantasies and to share the same with people in different parts of the world without having to experience the physical consequences of the relationship.This behavior has long been debated to be a case of sexual infidelity.The available literature that discusses the advantages and disadvantages of cybersex is inclined towards the perception that the activity has more significant cons than it does the pros.The disadvantages (and possible advantages) of cyber-sexual activity can be comfortably divided into three categories with moral, social and religious implications.However, on all levels, the behavior has more negative impacts than positive ones, most of which take a lot of time, energy and resources to reverse.Personality theories can be used to understand abnormal sexual behavior.With personality theories, solving the problems that arise out of cybersex activities for individuals of different ages and marital status becomes easier because of a traceable chain of cause and effect events.The extent to which personality and sexual abnormality are related is debatable but research shows that there is a significant correlation.The significance of this study in academics and personal use is related to the need for insight and regenerative production of data that is related to it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.9790/1959-1436065

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As many as 22.3% of subjects decided to divorce and some seriously considered leaving their partners because they felt hurt, betrayed, rejected, abandoned, felt crushed, isolated, embarrassed, jealous, angry, and lost their confidence in their partners knowing that their partners carried out cybersex activities.

    “As many as 22.3% of subjects decided to divorce and some seriously considered leaving their partners because they felt hurt, betrayed, rejected, abandoned, felt crushed, isolated, embarrassed, jealous, angry, and lost their confidence in their partners knowing that their partners carried out cybersex activities. 26,27”

    From Cybersex addiction: An overview of the development and treatment of a newly emerging disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Research shows that the influence on the social relationship of cybersex addicts is the leading cause of divorce and separation from spouses.

    “Research shows that the influence on the social relationship of the cybersex addicts is the leading cause of divorce and separation from spouses.²⁶”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 1

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jones, D. (2008). Cyber Sex for Nuts. Excerpt from Sex Prisoners. Retrieved 25 Sep., 2012,From http://www.whattheproblemis.com/documents/cb/cb_cybersex.pdfLaaser, M. R. & Gregoire, J. L (2003). Pastors and Cybersex Addiction. Sexual and Relationship Therapy,18 (3), 396-407. Retrieved

Metadata

Authors
University Putra Malaysia. Malaysia, & Tanimoonwo, G.
Venue
IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science
Publisher
IOSR Journals
Published
2013
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
60-65
ISSN
  • 2279-0837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2279-0845
OpenAlex
W2317552097
Cited by
1
References
9
Citations by year
2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
cybersex, online sexual behavior, sexual infidelity, personality theory, abnormal sexual behavior, ethical implications, social consequences, online relationships, compulsive sexual behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review