Daniel, Hans-Dieter

What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetrics

Cited by 1,607

Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis

BORNMANN, L., MUTZ, R., & DANIEL, H. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Cited by 337

A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants

Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010) · PLoS ONE

Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Cited by 231

Gender effects in the peer reviews of grant proposals: a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing traditional and multilevel approaches

Marsh, H. W., Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.-D., & O’Mara, A. (2009) · Review of Educational Research

Psychology Research and BibliometricsMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Cited by 174

Research Assessment in the Humanities

Ochsner, M., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H. (2016) · Springer eBooks

scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPublishing and Scholarly Communication

Cited by 68

The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews

BORNMANN, L., & DANIEL, H. (2009) · Learned Publishing

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Writing and Publishing

Cited by 51

Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts: how far do comments differ in language use?

Bornmann, L., Wolf, M., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012) · Scientometrics

Publishing and Scholarly Communicationscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Cited by 49

Reliability of reviewers' ratings when using public peer review: a case study

BORNMANN, L., & DANIEL, H. ‐. (2010) · Learned Publishing

Publishing and Scholarly CommunicationAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Cited by 49