CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

Research Assessment in the Humanities

Open access
Michael Ochsner, Sven E. Hug, Hans‐Dieter Daniel·2016·Springer eBooks
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This book analyses and discusses the recent developments for assessing research quality in the humanities and related fields in the social sciences. Research assessments in the humanities are highly c

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Ochsner, M., Hug, S. E., & Daniel, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
ORCID
Venue
Springer eBooks
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published
2016
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4
OpenAlex
W2599781508
Cited by
68
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
3.74
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Directory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
research evaluation, humanities research, research quality assessment, social sciences, academic assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review