Fanelli, Daniele
Heriot-Watt University · London School of Economics and Political Science
15 papers on CoChatORCID 0000-0003-1780-1958
Most cited papers
- Verified
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
Fanelli, D. (2009) · PLoS ONE
Academic integrity and plagiarismBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
Cited by 1,911
- Verified
What does research reproducibility mean?
Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine
Scientific Computing and Data ManagementAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 1,293
- Verified
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Fanelli, D. (2012) · Scientometrics
scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 1,248
- Verified
Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data
Fanelli, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE
Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 805
- Verified
“Positive” results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
Fanelli, D. (2010) · PLoS ONE
scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and Bibliometrics
Cited by 734
- Verified
Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015) · PLOS Biology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 495
- Verified
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
Fanelli, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Academic Publishing and Open AccessAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Cited by 416
- Verified
Meta-assessment of bias in science
Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Cited by 364
- Verified
Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign
Fanelli, D. (2013) · PLoS Medicine
Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 272
- Verified
Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity
Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015) · PLOS ONE
Academic integrity and plagiarismAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 268
- Verified
Data sharing and reanalysis of randomized controlled trials in leading biomedical journals with a full data sharing policy: survey of studies published in The BMJ and PLOS Medicine
Naudet, F., Sakarovitch, C., Janiaud, P., Cristea, I., Fanelli, D., Moher, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018) · BMJ
Research Data Management PracticesAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Cited by 227
- Verified
Researchers’ Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century
Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016) · PLOS ONE
scientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Cited by 205
- Verified
What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses
Fanelli, D., Wong, J., & Moher, D. (2022) · Accountability in Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Cited by 49
- Verified
Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data
Bakker, C., Boughton, S., Faggion, C. M., Fanelli, D., Kaiser, K., & Schneider, J. (2024) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic integrity and plagiarism
Cited by 28
- Verified
What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses
Fanelli, D., & Moher, D. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Academic integrity and plagiarismMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Cited by 10
Go further with a free account
Verify every reference, keep papers in a library, and ask questions across them.
Sign up - it is free