The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity?
Abstract
Gene-edited babies who might be born in the future should be monitored over the course of their life.These patients' physical, mental, and social health monitoring should be coordinated by clinicians in ways that anonymize patients' data for privacy protection but also allow for national and international aggregate evaluations.Transnational monitoring efforts should focus on safety and efficacy, social and disability justice, what constitutes the standard of care, and how best to promote both access to care and social and genomic research and innovation.In addition, effective and binding mechanisms for stopping or limiting uses of gene editing technology should be developed.Case Dr L and her team are germline editing researchers who are about to begin work with Dr M at her university hospital fertility clinic on a germline genome editing pilot protocol approved after extensive public comment and review by ethical, safety, disability and social justice, and regulatory bodies.Four couples in which both partners are carriers for well-studied severe monogenic conditions have given their consent to be involved in the clinical trial.Later in the week, Dr L, Dr M, and the couples will be meeting with Dr C and Dr D, who have been designated as the long-term monitoring physicians for physical and mental health, respectively, for any children born from this trial.They will also be meeting with Dr Q, a bioethics specialist, who will be monitoring the social aspects of follow-up care.The purpose of these meetings is to debrief with clinical teams about what kind of follow-up monitoring, care, and feedback are appropriate.What should they cover in these meetings?How should babies who underwent germline genome editing be monitored over the course of their life?Commentary The world's first known "CRISPRed" babies, Chinese twin girls, were born in October 2018 after researcher He Jiankui used clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) technology to disable a gene called CCR5 in their genomes so as to
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, monitoring may be extended to mental health and social issues (Thompson 2019).”
From Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic (2023) · cites this paper as Thompson 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
(UN), U. N. (2009) · Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik · doi:10.1515/9783110208856.203 · Cited by 848
Hendriks (1997) · European Journal of Health Law · doi:10.1163/15718099720521896 · Cited by 819
Genome-edited baby claim provokes international outcry
Cyranoski, D., & Ledford, H. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07545-0 · Cited by 236
Smietana, M., Thompson, C., & Twine, F. W. (2018) · Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001 · Cited by 184
Medical Migrations Afterword: Science as a Vacation?
Thompson, C. (2011) · Body & Society · doi:10.1177/1357034x11405549 · Cited by 42
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Charis Thompson, PhD is a Research Quality Investment Fund professor in the Department of Sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. She was previously Chancellor's Professor of Gender and Women's Studies at the University of California (UC), Berkeley, where she was also a founding co- director of the Science, Technology, and Society Center. She is the author of Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies (MIT Press, 2005), Good Science: the Ethical Choreography of Stem Cell Research (MIT Press, 2013), and numerous articles on reproductive and regenerative technologies, the life sciences, biomedicine, bioethics, biodiversity conservation, and selective pronatalism. She has also served on the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Genome Editing Working Group; the World Economic Forum Global Technology Council on Technology, Values and Policy; and UC Berkeley's Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee. Editor's Note The case to which this commentary is a response was developed by the editorial staff. Citation AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(12):E1036-1041. DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036.
Cited by
Initial heritable genome editing: mapping a responsible pathway from basic research to the clinic
Ranisch, R., Trettenbach, K., & Arnason, G. (2023) · Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-022-10115-x · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Venue
- AMA Journal of Ethics
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-12-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- E1036-1041
- ISSN
- 2376-6980
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036
- The paper
- How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity? (2019). AMA Journal of Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.