The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making and breaking families – reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together
Open accessAbstract
In February 2016 we convened a workshop at UC Berkeley, Making Families: Transnational Surrogacy, Queer Kinship, and Reproductive Justice. We were seeking to bring into direct conversation three theoretical frameworks that have each transformed scholarship and influenced practice around transnational surrogacy and reproduction: ‘stratified reproduction’, ‘reproductive justice’, and ‘queer reproductions’. Given the different intellectual and activist genealogies of these three fields, our aim in the workshop and in this resulting symposium issue was twofold: firstly, to draw out the explicit and implicit contributions of these three areas to understanding and helping shape the changing landscape of transnational surrogacy and assisted reproductive technology (ART) and secondly, to work through apparent tensions among these three approaches so as to forge intellectual and political solidarities that can strengthen scholarship and influence policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Ahmed, S. (2024) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55397-4_18 · Cited by 2,722
Ahmed, S. (2017) · doi:10.1215/9780822373377 · Cited by 2,722
Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism
Noble, S. U. (2020) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1pwt9w5 · Cited by 2,709
Is kinship always already heterosexual?
BUTLER, J. (2002) · differences · doi:10.1215/10407391-13-1-14 · Cited by 715
DEVIANCE AS RESISTANCE: A New Research Agenda for the Study of Black Politics
Cohen, C. J. (2004) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x04040044 · Cited by 539
Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination
Benjamin, R. (2016) · Engaging Science, Technology, and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2016.70 · Cited by 193
Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: gifts for global sisters?
Pande, A. (2011) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.007 · Cited by 179
Cited by
The Politics of Postgenomic Reproduction: Exploring Pregnant Narratives from within a Clinical Trial
Valdez, N. (2022) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/01622439211066759 · Cited by 4
How Should “CRISPRed” Babies Be Monitored Over Their Life Course to Promote Health Equity?
(2019) · AMA Journal of Ethics · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.1036 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Smietana, M., Thompson, C., & Twine, F. W.
- Venue
- Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 112-130
- ISSN
- 2405-6618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900218326
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 6.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making and breaking families – reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
- The paper
- Smietana, M., Thompson, C., & Twine, F. W. (2018). Making and breaking families – reading queer reproductions, stratified reproduction and reproductive justice together. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2018.11.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.