Cited by 4Empathy and Medical EducationArt Therapy and Mental HealthParticipatory Visual Research Methods

Activating empathy through art in cancer communities

Open access
Megan Hildebrandt, Robin N Richardson, Joy Scanlon·2022·AMA Journal of Ethics

Abstract

Background: The Aesthetics of Health (AOH) undergraduate visual art studies course at the University of Texas at Austin aimed to enhance art students' awareness of cancer's impact not only medically but also socially, emotionally, financially, and spiritually and to examine how this experience might impact students' artwork, capacity for empathy, and connection to audience. Methods: During the spring 2021 semester, the AOH course instructors employed assorted pedagogical methods, including art, illness narrative, and community engagement, in special sessions led by professors, community practice artists, and cancer experts, respectively, as well as oral storytelling by those with lived experience of cancer (ie, cancer patients, posttreatment survivors, and loved ones). For the course's final project, the 15 student-artists created self-selected media works combining health and activism and displayed them in public spaces, including online. Student-artists took the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire during the first and last weeks of the course and provided feedback. Two group interviews were also held with cancer storytellers following their participation. Results: Student-artists' average score on the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire increased from 52.46 at pretest to 55.38 at posttest. Student-artists and storytelling participants also reported having positive experiences. Conclusions: The AOH course's social practice approach encouraged student-artists to realize new ideas and relationships and modestly increased their capacity for empathy. The AOH framework demonstrates promise for increasing empathy through the arts in other educational, clinical, and artistic institutions. Further research is needed with larger sample sizes to measure the impact of the course and to demonstrate its potential for addressing burnout and moral distress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/amajethics.2022.590

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Art encourages empathy and cultural sensitivity, enabling better patient-clinician communication.

    “Moreover, art encourages empathy and cultural sensitivity, enabling better patient-clinician communication [2].”

    From Integration of AI-Generated Images in Clinical Otolaryngology (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Abstract reports that an arts-based course modestly increased empathy among 15 student-artists, supporting the empathy portion of the claim. It does not report increased cultural sensitivity or improved patient-clinician communication; the discussion described in the Conclusions was between student-artists and cancer storytellers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Visual representations can be used in support groups, helping patients relate to and cope with shared experiences, fostering a sense of community and understanding.

    “Visual representations can also be used in support groups, helping patients relate to and cope with shared experiences, fostering a sense of community and understanding [2].”

    From Integration of AI-Generated Images in Clinical Otolaryngology (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    The Course design section describes student-artists making portraits while people affected by cancer shared their stories. In the Storytellers’ comments section, one participant called the experience therapeutic. The paper does not describe using visual representations in patient support groups or show that they helped patients relate to shared experiences and build community. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hildebrandt, M., Richardson, R. N., & Scanlon, J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
AMA Journal of Ethics
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
E590-598
ISSN
  • 1937-7010 (ISSN-L)
  • 2376-6980
OpenAlex
W4285605954
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 4
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The AMA Journal of Ethic (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Texas at Austin
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
empathy, cancer, art education, socially engaged art, illness narratives, lived experience of cancer, Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, community participation, health activism, art students, cancer survivors, moral distress, burnout
MeSH terms
Art, Communication, Empathy, Humans, Neoplasms, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review