The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Treatment of Vitiligo With UV-B Radiation vs Topical Psoralen Plus UV-A
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 treatment modalities, topical psoralen plus UV-A (PUVA) with unsubstituted psoralen and 311-nm UV-B radiation, in patients with vitiligo. DESIGN: This intervention study was designed as a before-and-after trial with 2 arms, in which patients were consecutively included. PATIENTS: Male (n = 99) and female (n = 182) patients, who predominantly had skin type III, with extensive, generalized vitiligo of more than 3 months' duration. INTERVENTIONS: Two patient groups were investigated. The first group of patients was treated for 4 months with either topical PUVA (n = 28) or 311-nm UV-B radiation (n = 78). The second group of patients, treated twice weekly with 311-nm UV-B radiation, was followed up for 3 (n = 60), 6 (n = 27), 9 (n = 37), or 12 months (n = 51). RESULTS: Thirteen (46%) patients in the first group treated with topical PUVA showed repigmentation after 4 months. Fifty-two patients (67%) in the 311-nm UV-B treatment group showed repigmentation after 4 months. After 3 months, 5 patients (8%) in the second group showed more than 75% repigmentation of lesional skin compared with 32 patients (63%) after 12 months. As in other treatment modalities, the face showed good repigmentation, whereas hands and feet responded poorly. No adverse effects were encountered with treatment with narrowband UV-B radiation, contrary to those seen with topical PUVA treatment. The cumulative UV-B dose was very small compared with that of the topical PUVA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the treatment of patients with vitiligo with 311-nm UV-B radiation is as efficient as with topical PUVA and has fewer adverse effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The definition and assessment of vitiligo: a consensus report of the Vitiligo European Task Force
Taïeb, A., Picardo, M., & members, O. B. O. T. O. V. (2007) · Pigment Cell Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0749.2006.00355.x · Cited by 517
Taieb, A., Alomar, A., Böhm, M., Dell’Anna, M. L., De Pase, A., Eleftheriadou, V., Ezzedine, K., Gauthier, Y., Gawkrodger, D. J., Jouary, T., et al. (2013) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11197.x · Cited by 450
Tofacitinib Citrate for the Treatment of Vitiligo: A Pathogenesis-Directed Therapy
Craiglow, B. G., & King, B. A. (2015) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1520 · Cited by 259
Ethnic skin disorders overview
Halder, R. M., & Nootheti, P. K. (2003) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1067/mjd.2003.274 · Cited by 240
Narrow-band ultraviolet-B stimulates proliferation and migration of cultured melanocytes
Wu, C., Yu, C., Wu, C., Lan, C. E., & Yu, H. (2004) · Experimental Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.0906-6705.2004.00221.x · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Westerhof, W.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1525-1525
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032477353
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Vitiligo With UV-B Radiation vs Topical Psoralen Plus UV-A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.133.12.1525
- The paper
- Westerhof, W. (1997). Treatment of Vitiligo With UV-B Radiation vs Topical Psoralen Plus UV-A. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.133.12.1525
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.