The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acne Vulgaris and the Quality of Life of Adult Dermatology Patients
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of acne vulgaris on the quality of life of adult dermatology patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal questionnaire study. PATIENTS: Sixty patients with acne vulgaris attending appointments with their dermatologists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Findings using Skindex, a validated 29-item instrument to measure the effects of skin disease on patients' quality of life. Results are reported as 3 scale scores (functioning, emotions, and symptoms) and a composite score (average scale score). In addition, dermatologists rated the clinical severity of patients' skin disease, and patients responded to a global question about how they are bothered by acne. Higher Skindex scores indicate greater effects on quality of life. RESULTS: Patients with acne experienced functioning and emotional effects from their skin disease comparable with those of patients with psoriasis, but experienced fewer symptoms (for patients with acne and psoriasis, respectively, Skindex functioning scores of 14.9 and 22.8 [P=.08]; emotion scores, 39.2 and 38.9 [P=.95]; and symptoms scores, 29.5 and 42.1 [P<.05]). Skindex scores were higher in older patients than in younger patients, and patients aged 40 years or older were less likely to report improvement in their acne after 3 months (43% vs 85%; P<.05). Among patients reporting no improvement in their acne, older patients reported greater effects of their acne on their quality of life. Furthermore, in multivariate analyses, older adults reported more effects of acne on their quality of life than younger adults, even after controlling for sex and acne severity as judged by the dermatologist. CONCLUSIONS: Acne vulgaris significantly affects patients' quality of life. Regardless of the severity of acne, older adults were more affected by their acne.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris
Zaenglein, A. L., Pathy, A. L., Schlosser, B. J., Alikhan, A., Baldwin, H. E., Berson, D. S., Bowe, W. P., Graber, E. M., Harper, J. C., Kang, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.037 · Cited by 1,597
Staubach, P., Eckhardt-Henn, A., Dechene, M., Vonend, A., Metz, M., Magerl, M., Breuer, P., & Maurer, M. (2006) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06976.x · Cited by 243
The effect of polycystic ovary syndrome on health-related quality of life
Coffey, S., & Mason, H. (2003) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.1080/09513590312331290268 · Cited by 94
Jobanputra, R., & Bachmann, M. (2000) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00073.x · Cited by 71
Clinical and Therapeutic Profile and Quality of Life of Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis
Peyrí, J., & Lleonart, M. (2007) · Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/s1578-2190(07)70491-2 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasek, R. J., & Chren, M.-M.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 454
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985317924
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acne Vulgaris and the Quality of Life of Adult Dermatology Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.134.4.454
- The paper
- Lasek, R. J., & Chren, M.-M. (1998). Acne Vulgaris and the Quality of Life of Adult Dermatology Patients. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.134.4.454
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.