Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association of Dissatisfaction With Care and Psychiatric Morbidity With Poor Treatment Compliance

Renzi, Cristina, Picardi, Angelo, Abeni, Damiano, Agostini, Elisabetta, Baliva, Giannandrea, Pasquini, Paolo, Puddu, Pietro, Braga, Mario·2002·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with compliance with dermatologic treatment. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. Quality of life and psychological well-being were measured before the dermatologic visit with a self-completed questionnaire. Telephone interviews were performed 3 days and 4 weeks after the visit to evaluate patient satisfaction and medication adherence, respectively. SETTING: Outpatient clinics of a large dermatologic hospital in Rome, Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 1389 outpatients were contacted and 722 (52%) agreed to participate. Among them, 424 responded to the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of these, 396 (93%) completed the telephone interviews. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported compliance with dermatologic treatment. RESULTS: The dermatologists' prescriptions were not exactly followed by 44% of patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, treatment adherence was strongly associated with complete satisfaction. Poor quality of life on the emotions scale (indicating mainly high levels of shame and embarrassment) was also associated with medication adherence. On the contrary, a strong negative association was observed between psychiatric morbidity and compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first longitudinal study on dermatologic patients showing that dissatisfaction with care and psychiatric morbidity are significantly and independently associated with poor medication adherence. To improve medication adherence, particular attention should be dedicated to the physician's interpersonal skills, which emerged as a major component of patient satisfaction. Moreover, our results highlight the need for a timely identification and appropriate management of psychiatric disorders in everyday dermatologic practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.138.3.337

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Renzi, C., Picardi, A., Abeni, D., Agostini, E., Baliva, G., Pasquini, P., Puddu, P., & Braga, M.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
337-42
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001932609
Cited by
249
References
2
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Dissatisfaction With Care and Psychiatric Morbidity With Poor Treatment Compliance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.138.3.337
The paper
Renzi, C., Picardi, A., Abeni, D., Agostini, E., Baliva, G., Pasquini, P., Puddu, P., & Braga, M. (2002). Association of Dissatisfaction With Care and Psychiatric Morbidity With Poor Treatment Compliance. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.138.3.337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.