Cited by 54Psoriasis: Treatment and PathogenesisDermatology and Skin DiseasesSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments

Sulfasalazine Improves Psoriasis: A Double-blind Analysis

Gupta, Aditya K.·1990·Archives of Dermatology

Abstract

• In an 8-week double-blind trial of sulfasalazine for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 23 and 27 patients received the active and placebo tablets, respectively. At the end of the double-blind phase, there were 17 assessable patients receiving sulfasalazine; 7 (41%) had marked improvement, 7 (41%) had moderate improvement, and 3 (18%) demonstrated minimal change. Only 1 patient receiving placebo demonstrated moderate improvement, whereas the rest had minimal improvement or worsening of psoriasis. When the randomization code was broken, patients receiving sulfasalazine were allowed to continue therapy for an additional 4 weeks in an open manner, while those using placebo left the study. Six of 23 patients discontinued sulfasalazine therapy during the double-blind phase because of side effects, 4 due to the development of a cutaneous eruption and 2 due to nausea. Fourteen of 17 patients, who were assessable at the end of the 8-week double-blind phase, completed the additional 4 weeks of sulfasalazine therapy. Of these 14 patients, marked improvement occurred in 8 (57%), moderate improvement in 2 (14%), and minimal improvement in 4 (29%), compared with pretherapy. The low incidence of severe side effects makes sulfasalazine a consideration for oral therapy in patients whose disease severity does not justify use of methotrexate, etretinate, or psoralen plus UV-A, but whose disease severity is too widespread for safe and practical use of topical corticosteroids. (Arch Dermatol. 1990;126:487-493)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archderm.1990.01670280071013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sulfasalazine has been used for decades to treat autoimmune inflammatory bowel disease and psoriatic arthritis.

    “Intriguingly, sulfasalazine, a drug used for decades to treat autoimmune inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psoriatic arthritis (Gupta et al., 1990), is now recognized as targeting the BH4 pathway by inhibiting SPR (Haruki et al., 2013), in addition to other targets, such as NFκB (Wahl et al., 1998).”

    From The Role of Iron Regulation in Immunometabolism and Immune-Related Disease (2019) · cites this paper as Gupta et al., 1990

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, A. K.
Corresponding author
Gupta, Aditya K.
Venue
Archives of Dermatology
Published
1990-04-01
Volume
126
Issue
4
Pages
487
ISSN
0003-987X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4328006832
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Keywords
sulfasalazine, psoriasis, oral therapy, drug efficacy, adverse effects, rash, moderate-to-severe psoriasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review