The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved Discriminative and Evaluative Capability of a Refined Version of Skindex, a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Patients With Skin Diseases
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To improve Skindex, a dermatologic quality-of-life instrument. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal questionnaire study. SETTING: Dermatology clinic of a Veterans Affairs hospital and private dermatology practices. PATIENTS: Patients waiting for dermatology appointments; 201 patients responded to the original version of Skindex and 692 additional patients to the revised version. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reproducibility, internal consistency reliability, and validity of the revised version of Skindex. The revised version was compared with the original in 3 ways: the amount of time patients need to complete it; discriminative capability, determined as the number of items to which patients chose the same response; and evaluative capability, determined as the number of scales that were responsive to patients' reports of clinical change. RESULTS: With the revised 29-item version of Skindex, scale scores were reproducible after 72 hours (r = 0.88-0.92) and were internally reliable (Cronbach alpha = 0.87-0.96). The instrument demonstrated both construct and content validity; patients with psoriasis and eczema responded with higher scores than those with isolated lesions; in an exploratory principal axes factor analysis with an oblique rotation, 97% of the common variance was explained by 3 factors that correlated with the a priori scales; and most patients' responses to an open-ended question about their skin disease were addressed by items in the instrument. The average time to complete the revised instrument was 5 minutes (compared with 15 minutes for the original version). For only 3 items (10%) did 70% or more of patients choose the same response (vs 17 [28%] of items in the original version). All scales changed significantly in the expected direction in patients who reported that their skin had changed after 3 months (vs only 3 of 8 scales originally). CONCLUSION: The 29-item version of Skindex remains reliable and valid, but has decreased respondent burden and improved discriminative and evaluative capability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychiatric morbidity in dermatological outpatients: an issue to be recognized
Picardi, A., Abeni, D., Melchi, C. F., Puddu, P., & Pasquini, P. (2000) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03831.x · Cited by 413
Nyssen, O. P., Taylor, S. J., Wong, G., Steed, E., Bourke, L., Lord, J., Ross, C. A., Hayman, S., Field, V., Higgins, A., et al. (2016) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta20270 · Cited by 115
Ariëns, L., Nimwegen, K., Shams, M., Bruin, D., Schaft, J., Os-Medendorp, H., & Bruin-Weller, M. (2019) · Acta Dermato Venereologica · doi:10.2340/00015555-3212 · Cited by 79
Clinical and Therapeutic Profile and Quality of Life of Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis
Peyrí, J., & Lleonart, M. (2007) · Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/s1578-2190(07)70491-2 · Cited by 68
Ackermans, P. A. J., Solosko, T. A., Spencer, E. C., Gehman, S. E., Nammi, K., Engel, J., & Russell, J. K. (2012) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2011.10.007 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Chren, M.-M.
- Venue
- Archives of Dermatology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1433
- ISSN
- 0003-987X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023599146
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Discriminative and Evaluative Capability of a Refined Version of Skindex, a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Patients With Skin Diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archderm.1997.03890470111018
- The paper
- Chren, M.-M. (1997). Improved Discriminative and Evaluative Capability of a Refined Version of Skindex, a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Patients With Skin Diseases. Archives of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1997.03890470111018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.