The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Religious Commitment and Health Status: A Review of the Research and Implications for Family Medicine
Abstract
The empirical literature from epidemiological and clinical studies regarding the relationship between religious factors (eg, frequency of religious attendance, private religious involvement, and relying on one's religious beliefs as a source of strength and coping) and physical and mental health status in the areas of prevention, coping, and recovery was reviewed. Empirical studies from the published literature that contained at least 1 measure of subjects' religious commitment and at least 1 measure of their physical or mental health status were used. In particular, studies that examined the role of religious commitment or religious involvement in the prevention of illness, coping with illnesses that have already arisen, and recovery from illness were highlighted. A large proportion of published empirical data suggest that religious commitment may play a beneficial role in preventing mental and physical illness, improving how people cope with mental and physical illness, and facilitating recovery from illness. However, much still remains to be investigated with improved studies that are specially designed to investigate the connection between religious involvement and health status. Nevertheless, the available data suggest that practitioners who make several small changes in how patients' religious commitments are broached in clinical practice may enhance health care outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HOUSE, J. S., ROBBINS, C., & METZNER, H. L. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113387 · Cited by 1,381
Propst, L. R., Ostrom, R., Watkins, P., & Dean, T. (1992) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.60.1.94 · Cited by 423
Religiosity of psychotherapists: a national survey
Bergin, A. E., & Jensen, J. P. (1990) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.27.1.3 · Cited by 375 · cited 3×
“This review highlights studies linking religious commitment to (1) prevention of disease, ( 2 ) coping with illness, and (3) recovery from illness.”
BackgroundInfluentialReligious belief, depression, and ambulation status in elderly women with broken hips
(1990) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.147.6.758 · Cited by 253
The impact of religion on men's blood pressure
Larson, D. B., Koenig, H. G., Kaplan, B. H., Greenberg, R. S., Logue, E., & Tyroler, H. A. (1989) · Journal of Religion & Health · doi:10.1007/bf00986065 · Cited by 119
Cited by
Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2401_06 · Cited by 1,751
Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior
Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.10120 · Cited by 699
Cytokines and cognition–the case for a head-to-toe inflammatory paradigm.
Wilson, C. J., Finch, C. E., & Cohen, H. J. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50619.x · Cited by 637
Religiosity/spirituality and health: A critical review of the evidence for biological pathways.
Seeman, T. E., Dubin, L. F., & Seeman, M. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.1.53 · Cited by 589
Ehman, J. W., Ott, B. B., Short, T. H., Ciampa, R. C., & Hansen-Flaschen, J. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.15.1803 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, D. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Family Medicine
- Publisher
- CLOCKSS Archive
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 118-124
- ISSN
- 1063-3987 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131713276
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.