CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Risperidone, Lithium, or Divalproex Sodium for Initial Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Phase, in Children and Adolescents

Open access
Geller, Barbara·2012·Archives of General Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1508PMC PMC3581342
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

CONTEXT: There was a paucity of comparative pharmacological research for initial treatment of bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed phase, in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To investigate which medication to administer first to antimanic medication-naive subjects. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Treatment of Early Age Mania (TEAM) study recruited 6- to 15-year-old children and adolescents with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder (manic or mixed phase) at 5 US sites from 2003 to 2008 into a controlled, randomized, no-patient-choice, 8-week protocol. Blinded, independent evaluators conducted all baseline and end-point assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects received a titrated schedule of lithium, divalproex sodium, or risperidone. Medications were increased weekly only if there was inadequate response, and no dose-limiting adverse effects, to maximum doses of lithium carbonate (1.1-1.3 mEq/L), divalproex sodium (111-125 μg/mL), and risperidone (4-6 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impressions for Bipolar Illness Improvement-Mania and the Modified Side Effects Form for Children and Adolescents. RESULTS: There were 279 antimanic medication-naive subjects (mean [SD] age, 10.1 [2.8] years; 50.2% female) who had the following characteristics: 100% elated mood and/or grandiosity, 77.1% psychosis, 97.5% mixed mania, 99.3% daily rapid cycling, and mean (SD) mania duration of 4.9 (2.5) years. The mean (SD) titrated lithium level was 1.09 (0.34) mEq/L, and the mean (SD) divalproex sodium level was 113.6 (23.0) μg/mL. The mean (SD) titrated risperidone dose was 2.57 (1.21) mg. Higher response rates occurred with risperidone vs lithium (68.5% vs 35.6%; χ(2)(1) = 16.9, P < .001) and vs divalproex sodium (68.5% vs 24.0%; χ(2)(1) = 28.3, P < .001). Response to lithium vs divalproex sodium did not differ. The discontinuation rate was higher for lithium than for risperidone (χ(2)(1) = 6.4, P = .011). Increased weight gain, body mass index, and prolactin level occurred with risperidone vs lithium (F(1,212) = 45.5, P < .001; F(1,212) = 39.1, P < .001; and F(1,213) = 191.4, P < .001, respectively) and vs divalproex sodium (F(1,212) = 34.7, P < .001; F(1,212) = 45.3, P < .001; and F(1,213) = 209.4, P < .001, respectively). The thyrotropin level increased in subjects taking lithium (t(62) = 11.3, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone was more efficacious than lithium or divalproex sodium for the initial treatment of childhood mania but had potentially serious metabolic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00057681

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1508

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Geller, B.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Geller, Barbara
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
69
Issue
5
Pages
515
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1508
PMC
PMC3581342
OpenAlex
W2155569717
Cited by
281
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 9
FWCI
21.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH064869, U01MH064868, U01MH064846, U01MH064850, U01MH064851, R01MH051481, U01MH064911, U01MH064887)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar I disorder, manic phase, mixed phase, children and adolescents, risperidone, lithium, divalproex sodium, initial treatment, rapid cycling, treatment response, adverse effects, mood stabilizers, antipsychotic drugs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bipolar Disorder, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Valproic Acid, Lithium Carbonate, Treatment Outcome, Antimanic Agents, Risperidone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review