Cited by 167Treatment of Major DepressionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Tricyclic drugs for depression in children and adolescents

Hazell, Philip, O'Connell, Dianne, Heathcote, Diane, Henry, David A·2002·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Background There is a need to identify effective and safe treatments for depression in children and adolescents. While tricyclic drugs are effective in treating depression in adults, individual studies involving children and adolescents have been equivocal. Objectives To assess the effects of oral tricyclic antidepressants compared to placebo in the treatment of child and adolescent depression. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE (1966-1997), EMBASE, Excerpta Medica (June 1974-1997), the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Group trials register (most recent search 25/1/2000) and bibliographies of previously published reviews and papers describing original research were cross-checked. Current Contents was screened for recent publications. We contacted authors of relevant abstracts in conference proceedings of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and we hand searched the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (1978-1999). Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials comparing the efficacy of orally administered tricyclic medication with placebo in depressed people aged 6-18 years. Data collection and analysis Most studies reported multiple outcome measures including depression scales and clinical global impression scales. For each study the best available depression measure was taken as the index measure of depression outcome. Predetermined criteria were established to assist in the ranking of measures. Wher…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd002317

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hazell, P., O'Connell, D., Heathcote, D., & Henry, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2002-04-22
Issue
2
Pages
CD002317-CD002317
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4232604357
Cited by
167
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 15
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
tricyclic antidepressants, childhood depression, adolescent depression, children, antidepressant efficacy, antidepressant safety, adverse effects, placebo comparison, treatment response, subgroup analysis, Clinical Global Impression Scale, depression rating scales, treatment discontinuation, remission, treatment-emergent mania
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Child, Depression, Humans, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review