Cited by 118Schizophrenia research and treatmentRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Influence of patient race and ethnicity on clinical assessment in patients with affective disorders

Gara, Michael A., Vega, William A., Arndt, Stephan, Escamilla, Michael, Fleck, David E., Lawson, William B., Lesser, Ira, Neighbors, Harold W. +3 more·2012·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

CONTEXT: Rates of clinical diagnoses of schizophrenia in African American individuals appear to be elevated compared with other ethnic groups in the United States, contradicting population rates derived from epidemiologic surveys. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether African American individuals would continue to exhibit significantly higher rates of clinical diagnoses of schizophrenia, even after controlling for age, sex, income, site, and education, as well as the presence or absence of serious affective disorder, as determined by experts blinded to race and ethnicity. A secondary objective was to determine if a similar pattern occurred in Latino subjects. DESIGN: Ethnicity-blinded and -unblinded diagnostic assessments were obtained in 241 African American individuals (mean [SD] age, 34.3 [8.1] years; 57% women), 220 non-Latino white individuals (mean [SD] age, 32.7 [8.5] years; 53% women), and 149 Latino individuals (mean [SD] age, 33.5 [8.0] years; 58% women) at 6 US sites. Logistic regression models were used to determine whether elevated rates of schizophrenia in African American individuals would persist after controlling for various confounding variables including blinded expert consensus diagnoses of serious affective illness. SETTINGS: Six academic medical centers across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred ten psychiatric inpatients and outpatients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative odds of unblinded clinical diagnoses of schizophrenia in African American compared with white individuals. RESULTS: A significant ethnicity/race effect (χ(2)(2)=10.4, P=.01) was obtained when schizophrenia was narrowly defined, controlling for all other predictors. The odds ratio comparing African American with non-Latino white individuals was significant (odds ratio=2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-5.1). Similar differences between African American and white individuals occurred when schizophrenia was more broadly defined (odds ratio=2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-4.5). African American individuals did not differ significantly from white individuals in overall severity of manic and depressive symptoms but did evidence more severe psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: African American individuals exhibited significantly higher rates of clinical diagnoses of schizophrenia than non-Latino white subjects, even after controlling for covariates such as serious affective disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Parental attention to pain and solicitous behaviors encouraging children to avoid regular activities may be pathways by which parental catastrophizing amplifies a child's pain experience and behavior.

    “Parental attention to pain and solicitous behaviors that encourage children to avoid regular activities may provide specific pathways by which parental catastrophizing amplifies a child’s pain experience and behavior 116–118, 119.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 118

Authors
Gara, M. A., Vega, W. A., Arndt, S., Escamilla, M., Fleck, D. E., Lawson, W. B., Lesser, I., Neighbors, H. W., Wilson, D. R., Arnold, L. M., & Strakowski, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2012-06-01
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
593-600
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159445859
Cited by
118
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Southern California
  • Florida Department of Health
  • Texas Tech University
  • Creighton University
  • University of Cincinnati
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh068797-04, 5r01mh068807-04, 5r01mh068795-04, 5r01mh068819-04)
  • University of Florida Health
  • College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH068795, MH068797, MH068804, MH068819, R01MH068801, R01MH068804, MH068807, MH068801)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
schizophrenia, African Americans, Hispanic patients, race and ethnicity, diagnostic bias, mood disorders, psychosis severity, psychiatric inpatients and outpatients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, United States, Comorbidity, Logistic Models, Single-Blind Method, Mood Disorders, White People, Racial Groups, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review