The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope's needle. Study of 414 patients
Abstract
This article describes the results of a dual diagnostic procedure, thoracentesis and pleural biopsy with a Cope's needle, in 414 patients with pleural effusion of unknown origin. A diagnosis of neoplasia or pleural tuberculosis was obtained in 241 subjects (149 with neoplasias and 92 with pleural tuberculosis). In an additional 55 patients, a diagnosis of tuberculosis or neoplasia was obtained using other procedures (15 with tuberculosis and 40 with neoplasias). In 105 subjects, the effusion was neither tuberculosis nor neoplasia. Thirteen patients were excluded from this study due to the impossibility of follow-up. The diagnostic process was repeated in 64 patients. Complications occurred in 46 patients (11%), of which 42 were pneumothorax. The dual diagnostic sensitivity in our series of thoracenteses and pleural biopsies made with a Cope's needle was 86% in tuberculosis and 79% in neoplasia with 100% specificity. The probability of a case being neither tuberculosis nor pleural neoplasia (negative predictive value) when the liquid and the pleural biopsy specimen are nonspecific (each procedure having been applied only once on each patient) is 56%, although a negative result does not exclude these diagnoses. In our opinion, the repetition of the dual procedure is indicated considering the scant morbidity and zero mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Update on tuberculous pleural effusion
LIGHT, R. W. (2010) · Respirology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2010.01723.x · Cited by 466
Tuberculous Pleurisy: A Study of 254 Patients
Valdés, L., Álvarez, D., San José, E., Penela, P., Valle, J. M., García-Pazos, J. M., Suárez, J., & Pose, A. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.18.2017 · Cited by 417
Seibert, A. F., Haynes, J., Middleton, R., & Bass, J. B. (1991) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.99.4.883 · Cited by 320
Dendukuri, N., Schiller, I., Joseph, L., & Pai, M. (2012) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01773.x · Cited by 117
Nakajima, Y., Kuribayashi, K., Ishigaki, H., Tada, A., Negi, Y., Minami, T., Takahashi, R., Doi, H., Kitajima, K., Yokoi, T., et al. (2020) · Cancer Investigation · doi:10.1080/07357907.2020.1776313 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Bueno, C. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1190-1194
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148214927
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope's needle. Study of 414 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.150.6.1190
- The paper
- Bueno, C. E. (1990). Cytologic and bacteriologic analysis of fluid and pleural biopsy specimens with Cope's needle. Study of 414 patients. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.150.6.1190
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.