The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Cystic thyroid nodules. The dilemma of malignant lesions
Abstract
A retrospective study of 221 surgically resected thyroid nodules disclosed that 71 (32%) were cystic and 150 (68%) were solid lesions. Ultrasonography correctly characterized cystic nodules in all but one case. Comparing cystic and solid nodules, there were no differences in patient demographics (mean ages, 47.7 +/- 1.8 SEM vs 45.9 +/- 1.2 years; sex, 78% females both groups), the proportion that were solitary (39% vs 40%), or the nodule size (49% vs 47% greater than or equal to 2 cm in diameter). Of cystic thyroid lesions, 4% were simple cysts, 82% were degenerating benign adenomas or colloid nodules, and 14% were malignant compared with 23% of solid lesions that were malignant. Most cystic lesions (81%) contained bloody fluid. One benign true cyst was filled with thick brown fluid, while clear yellow fluid was repeatedly aspirated from one malignant cystic nodule. Malignant fine-needle aspiration cytology was the best predictor of cancer (100%). Much less predictable were signs of local compression or invasion (43%), a history of head or neck irradiation (33%), cyst recurrence after aspiration (29%), or an increase in the cystic nodule's size (7%). Indeterminate cytology identified malignancy with about half the frequency in cystic lesions as compared with solid nodules (13% vs 27%). The only false-negative fine-needle aspiration cytology occurred in a cystic lesion. In patients with cystic papillary cancers, needle aspirates contained insufficient material for diagnosis in 20% that occurred in no patient with solid papillary carcinoma. The sensitivities and specificities of fine-needle aspiration cytology for solid nodules were 100% and 55%, and for cystic nodules were 88% and 52%. Thus, cystic lesions are as likely as solid thyroid lesions to harbor a malignancy that cannot be predicted from the cyst's clinical characteristics or the patient's demographic data. Although fine-needle biopsy is the best predictor of malignancy in either cystic or solid thyroid lesions, it is slightly less reliable when a thyroid lesion is fluid filled rather than solid. We believe that most cysts not abolished by aspiration should be surgically excised.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Cooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Management of Simple Nodular Goiter: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Hegedüs, L., Bonnema, S. J., & Bennedbæk, F. N. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0016 · Cited by 710
DANESE, D., SCIACCHITANO, S., FARSETTI, A., ANDREOLI, M., & PONTECORVI, A. (1998) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.1998.8.15 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, E. T. D. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1990-07-01
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1422-1427
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113870921
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cystic thyroid nodules. The dilemma of malignant lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.150.7.1422
- The paper
- Santos, E. T. D. L. (1990). Cystic thyroid nodules. The dilemma of malignant lesions. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.150.7.1422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.