The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Perceived Quality of Life and Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment in Older Adults
Abstract
We investigated whether perceived quality of life is associated with preferences for life-sustaining treatment for older adults. Participants included chronically ill, elderly outpatients (N = 258) and their primary physicians (N = 105). Patients and physicians were independently administered a questionnaire regarding patient quality of life and preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation for the patient. Physicians rated patients' global quality of life, physical comfort, mobility, depression, anxiety, and family relationships significantly worse than did patients. Nearly all perceptions of patients' quality of life were significantly associated with physicians' perceptions, but not patients' treatment preferences. Patient-physician agreement on patient global quality of life was not significantly associated with agreement regarding treatment preferences. We conclude that primary physicians generally consider their older outpatients' quality of life to be worse than do the patients. Furthermore, physicians' estimations of patient quality of life are significantly associated with physicians' attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment for the patients. For the patients, however, perceived quality of life does not appear to be associated with their preferences for life-sustaining treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haffner, S. M. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.22.2661 · Cited by 441
Substituted Judgment: How Accurate Are Proxy Predictions?
Seckler, A. B., Meier, D. E., Mulvihill, M., & Cammer Paris, B. E. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-2-92 · Cited by 446
Wilkoff, B. L., Auricchio, A., Brugada, J., Cowie, M., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gillis, A. M., Hayes, D. L., Howlett, J. G., Kautzner, J., Love, C. J., et al. (2008) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.013 · Cited by 364
Emotional dimensions of chronic disease
Turner, J. (2000) · Western Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1136/ewjm.172.2.124 · Cited by 351
Lavie, C. J., Milani, R. V., & Littman, A. B. (1993) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/0735-1097(93)90176-2 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Uhlmann, R. F.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1991-03-01
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 495-495
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043153288
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceived Quality of Life and Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.151.3.495
- The paper
- Uhlmann, R. F. (1991). Perceived Quality of Life and Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment in Older Adults. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.151.3.495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.