Cited by 364Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesECG Monitoring and AnalysisInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations

Wilkoff, Bruce L., Auricchio, Angelo, Brugada, Josep, Cowie, Martin, Ellenbogen, Kenneth A., Gillis, Anne M., Hayes, David L., Howlett, Jonathan G. +7 more·2008·Heart Rhythm

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.04.013

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current recommended minimum frequency of monitoring for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices is once per year in person and every 3 to 6 months for ICD or 3 to 12 months for PM either remotely or in the office.

    “Current recommended minimum frequency of monitoring for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices is once per year in person and every 3 to 6 (ICD) or 3 to 12 (PM) months either remotely or in the office.51”
  • More timely detection of both clinical and device-related issues may improve care.

    “More timely detection of both clinical and device-related issues may improve care, 51”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkoff, B. L., Auricchio, A., Brugada, J., Cowie, M., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gillis, A. M., Hayes, D. L., Howlett, J. G., Kautzner, J., Love, C. J., Morgan, J. M., Priori, S. G., Reynolds, D. W., Schoenfeld, M. H., & Vardas, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino (CH)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CZ)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri (IT)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University Hospital of Heraklion (GR)
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
907-925
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116854993
Cited by
364
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 44
FWCI
23.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Rhythm (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
cardiac implantable electronic devices, cardiac pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, device follow-up, data management, regulatory compliance, reimbursement, ethical considerations, monitoring frequency, patient safety
MeSH terms
American Heart Association, Electric Countershock, Europe, Heart Failure, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Societies, Medical, United States, Defibrillators, Implantable, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review