The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomized trial of nortriptyline for severe chronic tinnitus. Effects on depression, disability, and tinnitus symptoms
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the antidepressant, nortriptyline, is effective for treatment of depression, tinnitus-related disability, and tinnitus symptoms in patients with severe chronic tinnitus. DESIGN: A 12-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A university otolaryngology clinic. PATIENTS: Ninety-two subjects with severe chronic tinnitus: 38 with current major depression and 54 with depressive symptoms and significant tinnitus-related disability. INTERVENTION: Nortriptyline (maintained at 50 to 150 mg/mL for 6 weeks) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Tinnitus Disability Measures, and Audiometric Measures. RESULTS: Nortriptyline was superior to placebo by multivariate analysis of covariance for depression (10.6 vs 14.3 final Hamilton Depression score), for tinnitus-related disability (1.8 vs 2.4 final MPI Tinnitus Interference), and tinnitus loudness (13.6 vs 20.0 dB final loudness match [in worst ear at tinnitus frequency]). When major depression and depressive symptoms groups were considered separately, nortriptyline was superior to placebo on these same measures but differences did not achieve statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The antidepressant nortriptyline decreases depression, functional disability, and tinnitus loudness associated with severe chronic tinnitus. What appears to be irreversible disability of otologic origin may, in part, be reversible disability of psychiatric origin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Efficacy and safety of mianserin in the treatment of depression of women with cancer
Costa, D., Mogos, I., & Toma, T. (1985) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1985.tb08081.x · Cited by 202
Cited by
Depression and Diabetes: Impact of Depressive Symptoms on Adherence, Function, and Costs
Ciechanowski, P. S., Katon, W. J., & Russo, J. E. (2000) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.160.21.3278 · Cited by 1,465
Lenze, E. J., Rogers, J. C., Martire, L. M., Mulsant, B. H., Rollman, B. L., Dew, M. A., Schulz, R., & Reynolds, C. F. (2001) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200105000-00004 · Cited by 593
Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments
Wiebe, S., Guyatt, G., Weaver, B., Matijevic, S., & Sidwell, C. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00537-1 · Cited by 573
Impact of major depression on chronic medical illness
Katon, W., & Ciechanowski, P. (2002) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00313-6 · Cited by 485
Cognitive behavioural therapy for tinnitus
Martinez-Devesa, P., Perera, R., Theodoulou, M., & Waddell, A. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005233.pub3 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Sullivan, M. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1993-10-11
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 2251-2259
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4247457843
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized trial of nortriptyline for severe chronic tinnitus. Effects on depression, disability, and tinnitus symptoms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.153.19.2251
- The paper
- Sullivan, M. D. (1993). A randomized trial of nortriptyline for severe chronic tinnitus. Effects on depression, disability, and tinnitus symptoms. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.153.19.2251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.