Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

National Patterns of Warfarin Use in Atrial Fibrillation

Randall Scott Stafford·1996·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite consensus that patients with atrial fibrillation benefit from warfarin sodium anticoagulation, little is known about national trends and predictors of anticoagulant use. METHODS: We analyzed 1062 visits by patients with atrial fibrillation to randomly selected office-based physicians included in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys in 1980, 1981, 1985, and 1989 through 1993. Warfarin and aspirin use in these patients was extrapolated to national patterns and logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors. RESULTS: Patients with atrial fibrillation made an estimated 1.3 (1980) to 3.1 (1992) million annual visits to physicians. Warfarin use in atrial fibrillation increased from 7% in 1980 and 1981 to 32% in 1992 and 1993 (P < .001 for trend). In 1992 and 1993, patients 80 years or older were significantly less likely to be taking warfarin (19%) compared with younger patients (36%), but showed similar rates of increase from 1980 and 1981 to 1992 and 1993. In 1992 and 1993, anticoagulation therapy was significantly more likely to be reported in visits to cardiologists (32%) and general internists (40%) compared with general and family practitioners (15%), but was similar in women (34%) and men (30%). Residents of the South (16%) had significantly lower rates of warfarin use than those in other regions of the United States (36%). Aspirin use increased from 3% to 10% (P = .001 for trend) and showed little overlap with warfarin use. Multiple logistic regression indicated that more recent year, residence outside the South, patient aged 65 to 74 years, and visits to cardiologists and internists increased the likelihood of warfarin use. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant use for atrial fibrillation has increased dramatically. The substantial increase from 1989 and 1990 to 1992 and 1993 coincided with the publication of several randomized clinical trials reporting the benefits of warfarin. Although it is unrealistic to expect universal warfarin use, the 1992 and 1993 rate of 32% is probably suboptimal given the benefit of anticoagulation in preventing embolic strokes. The oldest patients, in whom warfarin may have its greatest benefit, appear to have the lowest rates of anticoagulant use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.1001/archinte.156.22.2537

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Stafford, R. S.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Publisher
American Medical Association
Published
1996-12-09
Volume
156
Issue
22
Pages
2537-2537
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969012171
Cited by
212
References
1
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: National Patterns of Warfarin Use in Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.156.22.2537
The paper
Stafford, R. S. (1996). National Patterns of Warfarin Use in Atrial Fibrillation. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.156.22.2537

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.