The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Role of "Colonization Pressure" in the Spread of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci: An Important Infection Control Variable
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The spread of nosocomial multiresistant microorganisms is affected by compliance with infection control measures and antibiotic use. We hypothesized that "colonization pressure" (ie, the proportion of other patients colonized) also is an important variable. We studied the effect of colonization pressure, compliance with infection control measures, antibiotic use, and other previously identified risk factors on acquisition of colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). METHODS: Rectal colonization was studied daily for 19 weeks in 181 consecutive patients who were admitted to a single medical intensive care unit. A statistical model was created using a Cox proportional hazards regression model including length of stay in the medical intensive care unit until acquisition of VRE, colonization pressure, personnel compliance with infection control measures (hand washing and glove use), APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) 11 scores, and the proportion of days that a patient received vancomycin or third-generation cephalosporins, sucralfate, and enteral feeding. RESULTS: With survival until colonization with VRE as the end point, colonization pressure was the most important variable affecting acquisition of VRE (hazard ratio [HR], 1.032; 95% confidence interval [C1], 1.012-1.052; P=.002). In addition, enteral feeding was associated with acquisition of VRE (HR, 1.009; 95% CI, 1.000-1.017; P=.05), and there was a trend toward association of third-generation cephalosporin use with acquisition (HR, 1.007; 95% CI, 0.999-1.015; P=.11). The effects of enteral feeding and third-generation cephalosporin use were more important when colonization pressure was less than 50%. Once colonization pressure was 50% or higher, these other variables hardly affected acquisition of VRE. CONCLUSIONS: Acquisition of VRE was affected by colonization pressure, the use of antibiotics, and the use of enteral feeding. However, once colonization pressure was high, it became the major variable affecting acquisition of VRE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Population Perspective
Lipsitch, M., & Samore, M. H. (2002) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0804.010312 · Cited by 497
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?
Bonten, M. J., Willems, R., & Weinstein, R. A. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00145-1 · Cited by 400
Self-citationTime-dependent bias was common in survival analyses published in leading clinical journals
van Walraven, C., Davis, D., Forster, A. J., & Wells, G. A. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.12.008 · Cited by 337
Geldart, K. G., Kommineni, S., Forbes, M., Hayward, M., Dunny, G. M., Salzman, N. H., & Kaznessis, Y. N. (2018) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10107 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonten, M. J. M., Slaughter, S., Ambergen, A. W., Hayden, M. K., van Voorhis, J., Nathan, C., & Weinstein, R. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-05-25
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1127
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084066797
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.