The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative Autologous Donation Decreases Allogeneic Transfusion but Increases Exposure to All Red Blood Cell Transfusion<subtitle>Results of a Meta-analysis</subtitle>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Concern about risks associated with allogeneic red blood cell transfusion has led to interest in methods of decreasing patient exposure to perioperative transfusion. OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis to determine the degree to which predonation of autologous blood reduces patients' exposure to allogeneic blood and all transfusions of red blood cells (allogeneic or autologous). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies, annual reports, press releases, newsletters from organizations with interests in the blood system, and personal files for randomized studies and concurrent control cohort studies in which the control groups were patients excluded for nonmedical reasons. RESULTS: Patients who predonated autologous blood were less likely to receive allogeneic blood in the 6 randomized studies (n = 933) (odds ratio [OR], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.32) and in the 9 cohort studies (n = 2351) (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.14-0.26). However, autologous donors were more likely to undergo transfusion with allogeneic and/or autologous blood (for randomized studies: OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.70-5.39 and for cohort studies: OR, 12.32; 95% CI, 5.90-25.40). Studies that reported use of transfusion protocols found less benefit with preoperative autologous donation, although the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative autologous donation of blood decreases exposure to allogeneic blood but increases exposure to any transfusion (allogeneic and/or autologous). There is a direct relationship between the transfusion rate in the control group and the benefit derived from preoperative autologous donation. This suggests that other methods of decreasing blood transfusion, such as surgical technique and transfusion protocols, may be as important as preoperative autologous donation of blood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J. M., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay, H. J. (1996) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 · Cited by 17,582
The Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Viral Infections
Schreiber, G. B., Busch, M. P., Kleinman, S. H., & Korelitz, J. J. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199606273342601 · Cited by 1,867
Effect of anaemia and cardiovascular disease on surgical mortality and morbidity
Carson, J. L., Duff, A., Poses, R. M., Berlin, J. A., Spence, R. K., Trout, R., Noveck, H., & Strom, B. L. (1996) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)04330-9 · Cited by 996
Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials
Chalmers, T. C., Celano, P., Sacks, H. S., & Smith, H. (1983) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198312013092204 · Cited by 864
Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
Busch, O., Hop, W., van Papendrecht, M. H., Marquet, R. L., & Jeekel, J. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199305133281902 · Cited by 549
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6982.752 · Cited by 508
The Cost Effectiveness of Preoperative Autologous Blood Donations
Etchason, J., Petz, L., Keeler, E., Calhoun, L., Kleinman, S., Snider, C., Fink, A., & Brook, R. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503163321106 · Cited by 495
Heiss, M. M., Jauch, K.-W., Delanoff, C., Mayer, G., Schildberg, F.-W., Mempel, W., Mempel, M., & Eissner, H.-J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92247-q · Cited by 391
Laupacis, A., & Fergusson, D. (1997) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-199712000-00014 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Kunz, R., & Oxman, A. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1185 · Cited by 770
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials
Odgaard-Jensen, J., Vist, G. E., Timmer, A., Kunz, R., Akl, E. A., Schünemann, H., Briel, M., Nordmann, A. J., Pregno, S., & Oxman, A. D. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000012.pub3 · Cited by 439
Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication: An Analysis of Articles Used in Systematic Reviews
von Elm, E., Poglia, G., Walder, B., & Tramèr, M. R. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.8.974 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Forgie, M. A.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-03-23
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 610
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075236046
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Autologous Donation Decreases Allogeneic Transfusion but Increases Exposure to All Red Blood Cell Transfusion<subtitle>Results of a Meta-analysis</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.158.6.610
- The paper
- Forgie, M. A. (1998). Preoperative Autologous Donation Decreases Allogeneic Transfusion but Increases Exposure to All Red Blood Cell Transfusion<subtitle>Results of a Meta-analysis</subtitle>. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.6.610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.