The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Blood transfusions may adversely affect the prognosis of patients treated surgically for cancer, although definite proof of this adverse effect has not been reported. METHODS: We carried out a randomized trial to investigate whether the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer would be improved by a program of autologous blood transfusion as compared with the current practice of allogeneic transfusion. Patients in the autologous-transfusion group were required to donate two units of blood before surgery. RESULTS: A total of 475 patients were evaluated. We found no significant difference in prognosis between the allogeneic-transfusion group (236 patients) and the autologous-transfusion group (239 patients); colorectal cancer-specific survival rates at four years were 67 percent and 62 percent, respectively (P = 0.39). Among the 423 patients who underwent curative surgery, 66 percent of those in the allogeneic-transfusion group and 63 percent of those in the autologous-transfusion group had no recurrence of colorectal cancer at four years (P = 0.93). We also found that the risk of recurrence was significantly increased in patients who received blood transfusions, either allogeneic or autologous, as compared with patients who did not require transfusions; the relative rates of recurrence were 2.1 (P = 0.01) and 1.8 (P = 0.04), respectively; these rates did not differ significantly from each other. CONCLUSIONS: The use of autologous blood as compared with allogeneic blood for transfusion does not improve the prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. Regardless of their type, transfusions are associated with poor prognosis, probably because of the circumstances that necessitate them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Cited by
Riess, J. G. (2001) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr970143c · Cited by 773
Deleterious clinical effects of transfusion-associated immunomodulation: fact or fiction?
Vamvakas, E. C., & Blajchman, M. A. (2001) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v97.5.1180 · Cited by 423
Forgie, M. A. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.6.610 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Busch, O., Hop, W., van Papendrecht, M. H., Marquet, R. L., & Jeekel, J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 1993-05-13
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 1372-1376
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W1983258863
- Cited by
- 549
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm199305133281902
- The paper
- Busch, O., Hop, W., van Papendrecht, M. H., Marquet, R. L., & Jeekel, J. (1993). Blood Transfusions and Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199305133281902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.