The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Donepezil Improves Cognition and Global Function in Alzheimer Disease<subtitle>A 15-Week, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study</subtitle>
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Donepezil hydrochloride (Aricept) is a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor developed for the treatment of Alzheimer disease. This phase 3 study was 1 of 2 pivotal trials undertaken to establish the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. OBJECTIVES: To further examine the efficacy and safety of using donepezil in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease. To examine the relationships between plasma donepezil concentrations, inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity, and clinical response. METHODS: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with a 3-week single-blind washout. Outpatients at 23 centers in the United States were randomized to receive placebo, 5 mg of donepezil hydrochloride, or 10 mg of donepezil hydrochloride (5 mg/d during week 1 then 10 mg/d thereafter) administered once daily at bedtime. Primary efficacy was measured using the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change including caregiver information (CIBIC plus). RESULTS: A total of 468 patients entered the study, more than 97% of whom were included in the intention-to-treat (end point) analyses. The use of donepezil produced statistically significant improvements in ADAS-cog, CIBIC plus, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores, relative to placebo. The mean drug-placebo differences, at end point, for the groups receiving 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride were, respectively, 2.5 and 3.1 units for ADAS-cog (P<.001); 0.3 and 0.4 units for CIBIC plus (P< or =.008); and 1.0 and 1.3 units for Mini-Mental State Examination (P< or =.004). On the CIBIC plus scale, 32% and 38% of patients, respectively, treated with 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride demonstrated clinical improvement (a score of 1, 2, or 3) compared with placebo (18%). The mean (+/-SEM) donepezil plasma concentrations at study end point were 25.9 +/- 0.7 ng/mL and 50.6 +/- 1.9 ng/mL in the groups receiving dosages of 5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. Corresponding mean (+/-SEM) percentages of inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase activity were 63.9% +/- 0.9% and 74.7% +/- 1.2% for these 2 dosages, respectively. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between plasma concentrations of donepezil and acetylcholinesterase inhibition; the EC50 (50% effect) was obtained at a concentration of 15.6 ng/mL. A plateau of inhibition (80%-90%) was reached at plasma donepezil concentrations higher than 50 ng/mL. The correlations between plasma drug concentrations and both ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .006) were also statistically significant, as were the correlations between red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition and change in ADAS-cog (P<.001) and CIBIC plus (P = .005). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events with both dosages of donepezil (68%-78%) was comparable with that observed with placebo (69%). The use of 10 mg/d of donepezil hydrochloride was associated with transient mild nausea, insomnia, and diarrhea. There were no treatment-emergent clinically significant changes in vital signs or clinical laboratory test results. More important, the use of donepezil was not associated with the hepatotoxic effects observed with acridine-based cholinesterase inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Donepezil hydrochloride (5 and 10 mg) administered once daily is a well-tolerated and efficacious agent for treating the symptoms of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Applied Linear Statistical Models
Ziegel, E. R., Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1992) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269588 · Cited by 9,907
Applied Linear Statistical Models
(1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485141 · Cited by 7,185
A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W., Coben, L. A., & Martin, R. L. (1982) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · Cited by 7,056
A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease
(1984) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356 · Cited by 4,175
Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry
Freedman, A. M., & Kaplan, H. I. (1967) · The American Journal of the Medical Sciences · doi:10.1097/00000441-196712000-00052 · Cited by 3,799
Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests
Cochran, W. G. (1954) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001616 · Cited by 3,718 · cited 1×
“The categorical efficacy variable, the CIBIC plus, was analyzed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, with RIDITS as the score option.(27,28) The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test included adjustment for center.”
MethodSELECTIVE LOSS OF CENTRAL CHOLINERGIC NEURONS IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
DAVIES, P. (1976) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(76)91936-x · Cited by 3,565
A 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil in patients with Alzheimer's disease
Rogers, S. L., Farlow, M. R., Doody, R. S., Mohs, R., Friedhoff, L. T., & Donepezil Study Group* (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.50.1.136 · Cited by 1,618
Self-citation
Cited by
The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: A review of progress
Francis, P. T., Palmer, A. M., Snape, M., & Wilcock, G. K. (1999) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.2.137 · Cited by 2,198
Anton, R. F., O’Malley, S. S., Ciraulo, D. A., Cisler, R. A., Couper, D., Donovan, D. M., Gastfriend, D. R., Hosking, J. D., Johnson, B. A., LoCastro, J. S., et al. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.295.17.2003 · Cited by 1,930
Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017
Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Eckermann, G., Egberts, K., Gerlach, M., Greiner, C., et al. (2018) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/s-0043-116492 · Cited by 1,446
Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease.
Birks, J. S., & Harvey, R. J. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001190.pub3 · Cited by 1,200
Raina, P., Santaguida, P., Ismaila, A., Patterson, C., Cowan, D., Levine, M., Booker, L., & Oremus, M. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00009 · Cited by 771
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, S. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-05-11
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1021
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055727638
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 37.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Donepezil Improves Cognition and Global Function in Alzheimer Disease<subtitle>A 15-Week, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.158.9.1021
- The paper
- Rogers, S. L. (1998). Donepezil Improves Cognition and Global Function in Alzheimer Disease<subtitle>A 15-Week, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study</subtitle>. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.9.1021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.