The DOI matches its Crossref record; 982 of the 982 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017
Open accessAbstract
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the quantification and interpretation of drug concentrations in blood to optimize pharmacotherapy. It considers the interindividual variability of pharmacokinetics and thus enables personalized pharmacotherapy. In psychiatry and neurology, patient populations that may particularly benefit from TDM are children and adolescents, pregnant women, elderly patients, individuals with intellectual disabilities, patients with substance abuse disorders, forensic psychiatric patients or patients with known or suspected pharmacokinetic abnormalities. Non-response at therapeutic doses, uncertain drug adherence, suboptimal tolerability, or pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are typical indications for TDM. However, the potential benefits of TDM to optimize pharmacotherapy can only be obtained if the method is adequately integrated in the clinical treatment process. To supply treating physicians and laboratories with valid information on TDM, the TDM task force of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) issued their first guidelines for TDM in psychiatry in 2004. After an update in 2011, it was time for the next update. Following the new guidelines holds the potential to improve neuropsychopharmacotherapy, accelerate the recovery of many patients, and reduce health care costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
(1976) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,899
Effectiveness of Antipsychotic Drugs in Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia
Lieberman, J. A., Stroup, T. S., McEvoy, J. P., Swartz, M. S., Rosenheck, R. A., Perkins, D. O., Keefe, R. S. E., Davis, S. M., Davis, C. E., Lebowitz, B. D., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa051688 · Cited by 5,892
A New Initiative on Precision Medicine
Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1500523 · Cited by 5,202
Zanger, U. M., & Schwab, M. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007 · Cited by 4,169
The American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel (2012) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x · Cited by 2,578
Pharmacogenomics: Translating Functional Genomics into Rational Therapeutics
Evans, W. E., & Relling, M. V. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.487 · Cited by 2,475
STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2
O'Mahony, D., O'Sullivan, D., Byrne, S., O'Connor, M. N., Ryan, C., & Gallagher, P. (2014) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afu145 · Cited by 2,397
Lingjærde, O., Ahlfors, U. G., Bech, P., Dencker, S. J., & Elgen, K. (1987) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1987.tb10566.x · Cited by 1,705
Improving Safety with Information Technology
Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa020847 · Cited by 1,544
Cited by
Malhi, G. S., Bell, E., Bassett, D., Boyce, P., Bryant, R., Hazell, P., Hopwood, M., Lyndon, B., Mulder, R., Porter, R., et al. (2021) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867420979353 · Cited by 614
Revisited: Therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations of more than 1100 drugs and other xenobiotics
Schulz, M., Schmoldt, A., Andresen-Streichert, H., & Iwersen-Bergmann, S. (2020) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02915-5 · Cited by 390
Dose-response meta-analysis of antipsychotic drugs for acute schizophrenia
Leucht, S., Crippa, A., Siafis, S., Patel, M. X., Orsini, N., & Davis, J. M. (2020) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19010034 · Cited by 301
Milosavljevic, F., Bukvic, N., Pavlovic, Z., Miljevic, C., Pešic, V., Molden, E., Ingelman-Sundberg, M., Leucht, S., & Jukic, M. M. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3643 · Cited by 218
Himmerich, H., Kan, C., Au, K., & Treasure, J. (2021) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107667 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Eckermann, G., Egberts, K., Gerlach, M., Greiner, C., Gründer, G., Haen, E., Havemann-Reinecke, U., Hefner, G., Helmer, R., Janssen, G., Jaquenoud, E., Laux, G., Messer, T., Mössner, R., Müller, M., Paulzen, M., Pfuhlmann, B., Riederer, P., Saria, A., Schoppek, B., Schoretsanitis, G., Schwarz, M., Gracia, M., Stegmann, B., Steimer, W., Stingl, J., Uhr, M., Ulrich, S., Unterecker, S., Waschgler, R., Zernig, G., Zurek, G., & Baumann, P.
- Venue
- Pharmacopsychiatry
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2017-09-14
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 01/02
- Pages
- 9-62
- ISSN
- 0176-3679 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-0795
- OpenAlex
- W2753966476
- Cited by
- 1,446
- References
- 982
- FWCI
- 93.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0043-116492
- The paper
- Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Eckermann, G., Egberts, K., Gerlach, M., Greiner, C., Gründer, G., Haen, E., Havemann-Reinecke, U., Hefner, G., Helmer, R., Janssen, G., Jaquenoud, E., Laux, G., Messer, T., . . . Baumann, P. (2018). Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017. Pharmacopsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-116492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.