Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Processes and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results From the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Cohort Study

Fine, Michael J., Stone, Roslyn A., Singer, Daniel E., Coley, Christopher M., Marrie, Thomas J., Lave, Judith R., Hough, Linda J., Obrosky, D. Scott, Schulz, Richard, Ricci, Edmund M., Rogers, Joan C., Kapoor, Wishwa N.·1999·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although understanding the processes of care and medical outcomes for patients with community-acquired pneumonia is instrumental to improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of care for this illness, limited information is available on how physicians manage patients with this illness or on medical outcomes other than short-term mortality. OBJECTIVES: To describe the processes of care and to assess a broad range of medical outcomes for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted at 4 hospitals and 1 health maintenance organization in Pittsburgh, Pa, Boston, Mass, and Halifax, Nova Scotia. Data were collected via patient interviews and reviews of medical records for 944 outpatients and 1343 inpatients with clinical and radiographic evidence of community-acquired pneumonia. Processes of care and medical outcomes were assessed 30 days after presentation. RESULTS: Only 29.7% of outpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, and only 5.7% had an assigned microbiologic cause. Although 95.7% of inpatients had 1 or more microbiologic tests performed, a cause was established in only 29.6%. Six outpatients (0.6%) died, and 3 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Of surviving outpatients, 8.0% had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 88.9% (nonemployed) to 95.6% (employed) of the surviving outpatients had returned to usual activities, yet 76.0% of outpatients had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. Overall, 107 inpatients (8.0%) died, and 81 of these deaths were pneumonia related. Most surviving inpatients (69.0%) had 1 or more medical complications. At 30 days, 57.3% (non-employed) to 82.0% (employed) of surviving inpatients had returned to usual activities, and 86.1% had 1 or more persisting pneumonia-related symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, conducted primarily at hospital sites with affiliated medical education training programs, virtually all outpatients and most inpatients had pneumonia of unknown cause. Although outpatients had an excellent prognosis, pneumonia-related symptoms often persisted at 30 days. Inpatients had substantial mortality, morbidity, and pneumonia-related symptoms at 30 days.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.159.9.970

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Fine, M. J., Stone, R. A., Singer, D. E., Coley, C. M., Marrie, T. J., Lave, J. R., Hough, L. J., Obrosky, D. S., Schulz, R., Ricci, E. M., Rogers, J. C., & Kapoor, W. N.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
1999-05-10
Volume
159
Issue
9
Pages
970
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128639002
Cited by
285
References
0
FWCI
13.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Processes and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results From the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Cohort Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.159.9.970
The paper
Fine, M. J., Stone, R. A., Singer, D. E., Coley, C. M., Marrie, T. J., Lave, J. R., Hough, L. J., Obrosky, D. S., Schulz, R., Ricci, E. M., Rogers, J. C., & Kapoor, W. N. (1999). Processes and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results From the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Cohort Study. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.9.970

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.