Cited by 160Pneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Short- versus Long-Course Antibacterial Therapy for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background The evidence for traditionally recommended 7- to 14-day duration of antibacterial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is not well established. Objectives We endeavoured to assess the effectiveness and safety of shorter than traditionally recommended antibacterial therapy for CAP. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short- ( or = 2 days difference) course therapy for CAP with the same antibacterial regimens, in the same daily dosages. Results Five RCTs involving adults (including outpatients and inpatients who did not require intensive care) and two RCTs involving children (aged 2-59 months, residing in developing countries) were included. All RCTs were double-blind and assessed patients with CAP of mild to moderate severity. No differences were found between short- (adults 3-7 days; children 3 days) and long- (adults 7-10 days; children 5 days) course regimens (adults - amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, telithromycin and gemifloxacin; children - amoxicillin) regarding clinical success at end-of-therapy (six RCTs; 5107 patients [1095 adults, 4012 children]; fixed-effect model [FEM]; odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 95% CI 0.74, 1.07), clinical success at late follow-up, microbiological success, relapses, mortality (seven RCTs; 5438 patients; FEM; OR = 0.57; 95% CI 0.23, 1.43), adverse events (five RCTs; 3214 patients; FEM; OR = 0. 90; 95% CI 0.72, 1.13) or withdrawals as a result of adverse events. No differenc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/00003495-200868130-00004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Administration of a loading dose of antibiotic before prolonged infusion is essential to avoid delays to achieving effective beta-lactam concentrations.

    “Administration of a loading dose of antibiotic before prolonged infusion is essential to avoid delays to achieving effective beta-lactam concentrations (234).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dimopoulos, G., Matthaiou, D. K., Karageorgopoulos, D. E., Grammatikos, A. P., Athanassa, Z., & Falagas, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (GR)
  • Tufts University (US)
Venue
Drugs
Published
2008
Volume
68
Issue
13
Pages
1841-1854
ISSN
0012-6667 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026082339
Cited by
160
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
community-acquired pneumonia, short-course antibiotic therapy, antibiotic duration, antibiotic therapy, amoxicillin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, telithromycin, gemifloxacin, pediatric pneumonia, adverse drug reactions, relapse, mortality
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Age Factors, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Preschool, Drug Administration Schedule, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Pneumonia, Time Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Community-Acquired Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review