The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Epidemiologic Study of Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Outpatients: The Sirius Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little information is available concerning risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in nonhospitalized patients. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: An epidemiologic case-control study of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk factors was conducted in 1272 outpatients by general practitioners. The case population (636 patients presenting with DVT) was paired with the control population (636 patients presenting with influenzal or rhinopharyngeal syndrome) according to sex and age. Deep vein thrombosis was to be documented by at least 1 objective test. Risk factors were classified into "intrinsic" ("permanent") and "triggering" ("transient") factors and were evidenced using univariate analysis. RESULTS: In the medical population, defined as patients who had not undergone surgery or application of a plaster cast to the lower extremities within the 3 weeks preceding inclusion (494 cases and 494 controls), intrinsic factors such as history of VTE, venous insufficiency, chronic heart failure, obesity, immobile standing position, history of more than 3 pregnancies, and triggering factors such as pregnancy, violent effort, or muscular trauma, deterioration of general condition, immobilization, long-distance travel, and infectious disease were significantly more frequent in the case patients than in the controls (odds ratio, >1; P<.05). In the overall population, additional risk factors were cancer, blood group A, plaster cast of the lower extremities, and surgery. In both populations, the number of risk factors per patient was greater in the case patients than in the controls. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for DVT were identified in medical outpatients presenting with DVT, and their comprehension may improve appropriateness and efficiency of the different methods available for thromboprophylaxis. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3415-3420.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism
White, R. H. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000078468.11849.66 · Cited by 2,310
Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism
Heit, J. A. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2015.83 · Cited by 1,277
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism
(2003) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.58.6.470 · Cited by 686
Safety of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Randomized Clinical Trials
Levi, M., Levy, J. H., Andersen, H. F., & Truloff, D. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1006221 · Cited by 677
Horlander, K. T., Mannino, D. M., & Leeper, K. V. (2003) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.163.14.1711 · Cited by 657
Metadata
- Authors
- Samama, M.-M.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-12-11
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 3415
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067086317
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Epidemiologic Study of Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Outpatients: The Sirius Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.160.22.3415
- The paper
- Samama, M.-M. (2000). An Epidemiologic Study of Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medical Outpatients: The Sirius Study. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.22.3415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.