The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Survival Predictors in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical and epidemiological relevance of different prognostic factors for survival in patients with advanced or terminal cancer remains controversial. PURPOSES: To establish the survival of patients with cancer after diagnosis of terminal disease and to determine the predictors of survival. METHODS: An inception cohort of 227 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with terminal cancer of the lung, breast, and gastrointestinal tract were observed from July 1, 1996, through December 31, 1998. Tumor- and treatment-specific, clinical, laboratory, demographic, and socioeconomic variables were recorded at baseline. The relationships between these characteristics and survival time were examined using univariate Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: At the time of data analysis, 208 patients (91.6%) had died; the overall median survival for the sample was 15.3 weeks. Shorter survival was independently associated (P< or =.05) with a primary tumor of the lung (vs breast and gastrointestinal tract combined), liver metastases, moderate to-severe comorbidity levels (vs absent-to-mild levels), weight loss of greater than 8.1 kg in the previous 6 months, serum albumin levels of less than 35 g/L, lymphocyte counts of less than 1 X 10(9)/L, serum lactate dehydrogenase levels of greater than 618 U/L, and clinical estimation of survival by the treating physician of less than 2 months (vs 2-6 and >6 months). Performance status, symptoms other than nausea and vomiting, tumor burden, and socioeconomic characteristics such as social support and education and income levels did not appear to be independently associated with survival after adjusting for the effect of prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Simple clinical and laboratory assessments are useful aids in the prediction of survival in patients with solid malignant neoplasms at the onset of terminal stages. Methodological improvements in the design and implementation of survival studies may reduce prognostic uncertainty and ultimately provide better care for the terminally ill patients and their families.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1995) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/0885-3924(95)00056-5 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Templeton, A. J., McNamara, M. G., Šeruga, B., Vera-Badillo, F. E., Aneja, P., Ocaña, A., Leibowitz-Amit, R., Sonpavde, G., Knox, J. J., Tran, B., et al. (2014) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju124 · Cited by 2,829
Mourtzakis, M., Prado, C. M. M., Lieffers, J. R., Reiman, T., McCargar, L. J., & Baracos, V. E. (2008) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/h08-075 · Cited by 2,224
Gupta, D., & Lis, C. G. (2010) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-69 · Cited by 1,485
Depression as a predictor of disease progression and mortality in cancer patients: A Meta‐Analysis
Satin, J. R., Linden, W., & Phillips, M. J. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24561 · Cited by 972
Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis
Kroenke, C. H., Kubzansky, L. D., Schernhammer, E. S., Holmes, M. D., & Kawachi, I. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.2846 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Viganó, A., Bruera, E., Jhangri, G. S., Newman, S. C., Fields, A. L., & Suarez-Almazor, M. E.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-03-27
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 861
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040310950
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Survival Predictors in Patients With Advanced Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.160.6.861
- The paper
- Viganó, A., Bruera, E., Jhangri, G. S., Newman, S. C., Fields, A. L., & Suarez-Almazor, M. E. (2000). Clinical Survival Predictors in Patients With Advanced Cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.6.861
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.