Cited by 323Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Symptom distress in newly diagnosed ambulatory cancer patients and as a predictor of survival in lung cancer

Open access
Degner, Lesley F., Sloan, Jeffrey A.·1995·Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Abstract

Levels of symptom distress are most often measured in a clinical trial context rather than in general ambulatory populations. The purpose of this paper is to report levels of symptom distress in such a population, and to describe the factors associated with this distress. Over a 6-month period, a consecutive sample of 434 newly diagnosed patients, including 82 patients with lung cancer, were tested with the symptom distress scale at two tertiary oncology clinics serving the population of one Canadian prairie province. While levels of symptom distress in this population were generally low, the most problematic symptoms for patients were fatigue and insomnia, with 40% and 30% having moderate or high scores on these symptoms, respectively. Patients with advanced disease reported more distress than those with early stage disease; women reported more distress than men; older patients had less distress than younger patients; distress was highest in lung cancer patients and lowest in men with genitourinary cancers. Consistent with the findings of four previous studies, the single measure of symptom distress was a significant predictor of survival in lung cancer patients, with the exception of three patients who had substantial post-thoracotomy symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0885-3924(95)00056-5

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caregivers of patients with LC report significant emotional distress.

    “Caregivers of patients with LC report feeling unprepared, lacking caregiving resources,11,12 having low self-efficacy for managing patient symptoms, experiencing significant emotional distress,13, 14, 15 and receiving minimal psychosocial care.6,16,17”

    From Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial of CareSTEPS: A Supportive Care Intervention for the Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The patient-results passage (indexed as Abstract; page unavailable) reports symptom distress among cancer patients, including those with lung cancer, not emotional distress among their caregivers. A later discussion passage mentions family issues but does not report caregivers’ distress. Searches for caregiver emotional distress and family-member distress found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ruckdeschel JC, Piantadosi S. Lung .Cancer Study Choup. QualityofXe assessment in lung sur- gery for bronchogenic carcinoma. Theor Surg 1991;6:201-205.
  2. Kuktdl WA, McCorlde R, Dtiever M. Symptom dismss p.+osocial vatiabks. and survival from lung cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 1986;4:91-194.
  3. McCorkk R, Young K Development of a symp tom dism scale. Cancer Nuts 1978;10:37!l-378.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-08
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
423-431
ISSN
0885-3924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097149048
Cited by
322
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pain and Symptom Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
symptom distress, newly diagnosed cancer, ambulatory cancer patients, lung cancer, survival prediction, fatigue, insomnia, advanced disease, sex differences, age differences, genitourinary cancer, Symptom Distress Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Ambulatory Care, Cancer Care Facilities, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review