The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quality of Anticoagulation Management Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Review of Medical Records From 2 Communities
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most treatment of patients at risk for stroke is provided in the ambulatory setting. Although many studies have addressed the proportion of eligible patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving warfarin sodium, few have addressed the quality of their anticoagulation management. OBJECTIVE: As a comprehensive assessment of quality, we analyzed the proportion of eligible patients receiving warfarin, the proportion of time their international normalized ratios (INRs) were within the target range, and, when an out-of-target range INR value occurred, the time until the next INR measurement was made. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical records of 660 patients with AF managed by general internists and family practitioners in Rochester, NY, and the Research Triangle area of North Carolina. RESULTS: Only 34.7% of eligible patients with AF received warfarin. The INR values were out of the target range approximately half the time, and the response to these values was not always timely. For all the measures considered, both Rochester practices with access to an anticoagulation service had higher (albeit not ideal) quality of warfarin management than the remaining practices. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant deficiencies in the practice of warfarin management and suggestive evidence that anticoagulation services can partially ameliorate these deficiencies. More research is needed to describe the quality of anticoagulation management in typical practice and how this management can be improved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness
Bodenheimer, T. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1775 · Cited by 2,961
Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists
Ansell, J., Hirsh, J., Hylek, E., Jacobson, A., Crowther, M., & Palareti, G. (2008) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.08-0670 · Cited by 2,118
The Pharmacology and Management of the Vitamin K Antagonists
Ansell, J., Hirsh, J., Poller, L., Bussey, H., Jacobson, A., & Hylek, E. (2004) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.204s · Cited by 1,528
Connolly, S. J., Pogue, J., Eikelboom, J., Flaker, G., Commerford, P., Franzosi, M. G., Healey, J. S., & Yusuf, S. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.750000 · Cited by 870
Wan, Y., Heneghan, C., Perera, R., Roberts, N., Hollowell, J., Glasziou, P., Bankhead, C., & Xu, Y. (2008) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.108.796185 · Cited by 514
Metadata
- Authors
- Samsa, G. P., Matchar, D. B., Goldstein, L. B., Bonito, A. J., Lux, L. J., Witter, D. M., & Bian, J.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-04-10
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 967
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057484890
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Anticoagulation Management Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Review of Medical Records From 2 Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.160.7.967
- The paper
- Samsa, G. P., Matchar, D. B., Goldstein, L. B., Bonito, A. J., Lux, L. J., Witter, D. M., & Bian, J. (2000). Quality of Anticoagulation Management Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results of a Review of Medical Records From 2 Communities. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.160.7.967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.