Cited by 514Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Anticoagulation Control and Prediction of Adverse Events in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review

Open access
Wan, Yi, Heneghan, Carl, Perera, Rafael, Roberts, Nia, Hollowell, Jennifer, Glasziou, Paul, Bankhead, Clare, Xu, Yongyong·2008·Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no systematic examination of the relationship between international normalized ratio (INR) control measurements and the prediction of adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane through January 2008 for studies of atrial fibrillation patients receiving vitamin-K antagonists that reported INR control measures (percentage of time in therapeutic range [TTR] and percentage of INRs in range) and major hemorrhage and thromboembolic events. In total, 47 studies were included from 38 published articles. TTR ranged from 29% to 75%; percentage of INRs ranged from 34% to 84%. From studies reporting both measures, TTR significantly correlated with percentage of INRs in range (P<0.001). Randomized controlled trials had better INR control than retrospective studies (64.9% versus 56.4%; P=0.01). TTR negatively correlated with major hemorrhage (r=-0.59; P=0.002) and thromboembolic rates (r=-0.59; P=0.01). This effect was significant in retrospective studies (major hemorrhage, r=-0.78; P=0.006 and thromboembolic rate, r=-0.88; P=0.03) but not in randomized controlled trials (major hemorrhage, r=0.18; P=0.33 and thromboembolic rate, r=-0.61; P=0.07). For retrospective studies, a 6.9% improvement in the TTR significantly reduced major hemorrhage by 1 event per 100 patient-years of treatment (95% CI, 0.29 to 1.71 events). CONCLUSIONS: In atrial fibrillation patients receiving orally administered anticoagulation treatment, TTR and percentage of INRs in range effectively predict INR control. Data from retrospective studies support the use of TTR to accurately predict reductions in adverse events.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.108.796185

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Prystowsky EN, Benson DW Jr, Fuster V, Hart RG, Kay GN, Myerburg RJ, Naccarelli GV, Wyse DG. Management of patients with atrial fibril- lation. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals. From the Subcommittee on Electrocardiography and Electrophysiology, American Heart Asso- ciation. Circulation. 1996;93:1262-1277.
  2. Anticoagulants in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis (ASPECT) Research Group. Effect of long-term oral antico- agulant treatment on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after myo- cardial infarction. Lancet. 1994;343:499 -503.
  3. Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Warfarin versus aspirin for prevention of thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation II Study. Lancet. 1994;343:687-691.
  4. Clua Espuny JL, mau Llorca MR, Aguilar MC, Grupo dT. Characteristics of oral anti-coagulation treatment in high-risk chronic auricular fibril- lation. [Spanish]. Atencion Primaria. 2004;34:414 -419.
  5. Pengo V, Zasso A, Barbero F, Banzato A, Nante G, Parissenti L, John N, Noventa F, Dalla Volta S. Effectiveness of fixed minidose warfarin in the prevention of thromboembolism and vascular death in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:433-437.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, Y., Heneghan, C., Perera, R., Roberts, N., Hollowell, J., Glasziou, P., Bankhead, C., & Xu, Y.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2008-11
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
84-91
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2548706052
Cited by
514
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 37
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation, vitamin K antagonists, international normalized ratio, INR control, time in therapeutic range, major bleeding, thromboembolic events, adverse event prediction
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation, Blood Coagulation, Clinical Trials as Topic, Hemorrhage, Humans, Prognosis, Time Factors, Vitamin K

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review