Cited by 79Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CarePatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Clinician-Patient Interactions About Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Patient and Family View

Back, Anthony L., Starks, Helene, Hsu, Clarissa, Gordon, Judith R., Bharucha, Ashok, Pearlman, Robert A.·2002·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Responding effectively to a patient request for physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is an important clinical skill that involves careful evaluation. Clinician responses to PAS requests, however, have only been described using data obtained from clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To describe qualities of clinician-patient interactions about requests for PAS that were valued by patients and their family members. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Intensive qualitative case study involving multiple longitudinal interviews conducted prospectively with patients pursuing PAS and with their family members and retrospectively with family members of deceased patients who seriously pursued PAS. The study setting was community based. Participants were recruited through patient advocacy organizations, hospices, and grief counselors. A total of 35 cases were studied: 12 were prospective and 23 were retrospective. Study procedures involved semistructured interviews that were audiotaped, transcribed, reviewed, and analyzed by a multidisciplinary research team. RESULTS: Three themes were identified that describe qualities of clinician-patient interactions that were valued by patients and family members: (1) openness to discussions about PAS; (2) clinician expertise in dealing with the dying process; and (3) maintenance of a therapeutic clinician-patient relationship, even when clinician and patient disagree about PAS. CONCLUSIONS: These patient and family accounts reveal missed opportunities for clinicians to engage in therapeutic relationships, including discussions about PAS, dying, and end-of-life care. Clinicians responding to patients requesting PAS need communication skills enabling them to discuss PAS and dying openly, as well as expertise in setting reasonable expectations, individualizing pain control, and providing accurate information about the lethal potential of medications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.162.11.1257

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Back, A. L., Starks, H., Hsu, C., Gordon, J. R., Bharucha, A., & Pearlman, R. A.
Affiliations
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Back, Anthony L.
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2002-06-10
Volume
162
Issue
11
Pages
1257
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108229060
Cited by
79
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
physician-assisted suicide, clinician-patient communication, end-of-life care, dying, therapeutic relationship, patient and family perspectives, communication skills, pain management, family members of deceased patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Competence, Communication, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Terminal Care, Suicide, Assisted, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review