Cited by 228Workplace Health and Well-beingCardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Chronic Work Stress and Marital Dissolution Increase Risk of Posttrial Mortality in Men From the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

Matthews, Karen A., Gump, Brooks B.·2002·Archives of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Acute life stressors can trigger premature death, but the role of more enduring, chronic stressors is less clear. We evaluated men's mortality risk associated with number of different work stressors and marital dissolution during the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Methods Men without definite evidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) at study entry but with above-average risk for CHD mortality based on blood pressure, serum cholesterol levels, and/or cigarette smoking were recruited into MRFIT. Survivors at the end of the trial were followed up for mortality for an additional 9 years. All 12,336 survivors who completed the work-event checklist at the annual evaluations during the trial were included in the analyses of work stressors, whereas the 10,904 who were married at the start of the trial were included in the analyses of marital dissolution. Results Increasing number of different work stressors and divorce during the trial were associated with total and cardiovascular mortality during the 9-year follow-up period (Ps Conclusion Work and marital stressors increase risk for mortality in men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archinte.162.3.309

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matthews, K. A., & Gump, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • State University of New York at Oswego (US)
Venue
Archives of Internal Medicine
Published
2002-02-11
Volume
162
Issue
3
Pages
309
ISSN
0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977610327
Cited by
228
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
21.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL65111, HL65112, P50HL065112, P50HL065111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
chronic occupational stress, divorce, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, men, Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial, coronary heart disease risk, life events, occupational stressors
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Divorce, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Workload, Marital Status, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review