The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Differences in Breast Cancer Stage, Treatment, and Survival by Race and Ethnicity
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, black and Hispanic white women with breast cancer present with more advanced stages and have poorer survival rates than non-Hispanic whites, whereas Asians and Pacific Islanders do not. However, Asians and Pacific Islanders and Hispanic whites are heterogeneous populations, and few studies have evaluated breast cancer stage, treatments, and mortality rates for subgroups of these populations. METHODS: Using data from 11 population-based tumor registries that participate in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program, we conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the relationship between race and ethnicity and breast cancer stage, treatments, and mortality rates. The cohort of 124,934 women diagnosed as having a first primary invasive breast carcinoma between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1998, included 97,999 non-Hispanic whites, 10,560 blacks, 322 American Indians, 8834 Asians and Pacific Islanders, and 7219 Hispanic whites. RESULTS: Relative to non-Hispanic whites, blacks, American Indians, Hawaiians, Indians and Pakistanis, Mexicans, South and Central Americans, and Puerto Ricans had 1.4- to 3.6-fold greater risks of presenting with stage IV breast cancer. Blacks, Mexicans, and Puerto Ricans were 20% to 50% more likely to receive or elect a first course of surgical and radiation treatment not meeting the 2000 National Comprehensive Cancer Network standards. In addition, blacks, American Indians, Hawaiians, Vietnamese, Mexicans, South and Central Americans, and Puerto Ricans had 20% to 200% greater risks of mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in breast cancer stage, treatments, and mortality rates are present by race and ethnicity. Breast cancer survival may be improved by targeting factors, particularly socioeconomic factors, that underlie these differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnic differences among patients with cutaneous melanoma
Cormier, J. N., Xing, Y., Ding, M., Lee, J. E., Mansfield, P. F., Gershenwald, J. E., Ross, M. I., & Du, X. L. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.17.1907 · Cited by 378
Kissane, D. W., Grabsch, B., Clarke, D. M., Smith, G. C., Love, A. W., Bloch, S., Snyder, R. D., & Li, Y. (2007) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.1185 · Cited by 376
Missed Opportunities: Racial Disparities in Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment
Bickell, N. A., Wang, J. J., Oluwole, S., Schrag, D., Godfrey, H., Hiotis, K., Mendez, J., & Guth, A. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.5799 · Cited by 363
Ell, K., Vourlekis, B., Xie, B., Nedjat‐Haiem, F. R., Lee, P., Muderspach, L., Russell, C., & Palinkas, L. A. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24500 · Cited by 132
Erwin, D. O., Treviño, M., Saad-Harfouche, F. G., Rodriguez, E. M., Gage, E., & Jandorf, L. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.005 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, C. I., Malone, K. E., & Daling, J. R.
- Venue
- Archives of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-01-13
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49
- ISSN
- 0003-9926 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056050422
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Breast Cancer Stage, Treatment, and Survival by Race and Ethnicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archinte.163.1.49
- The paper
- Li, C. I., Malone, K. E., & Daling, J. R. (2003). Differences in Breast Cancer Stage, Treatment, and Survival by Race and Ethnicity. Archives of Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.